I know that this is going to be a bit controversial, but it is clear to me based on modern findings that Indo-Europeans (those with R1a and R1b ancestry) are nothing more than the descendants of ancient zoophiles.

[A THREAD]
The domestication of the horse merely was an accidental consequence of the Proto-Indo-Europeans' predilection for ritual bestial sodomy, in what appears to be an ancient test of manhood among the Yamnaya.
Excavations of ancient Yamnayan burial mounds have found chieftains buried alongside their horses. This provides clues for the common Yamnaya practice of gastrointestinal excavation and mummification
Archaeological evidence shows that the baculum of the ancestors of the modern horse was much smaller than today and grew progressively larger after domestication indicating artificial selection by Indo-Europeans. For what purpose? Bigger, as they say, is better.
Chron's disease (extremely common in the European population) is in reality a result of an evolutionary arms race.
The constant leakage seen in Chron's disease is a side effect of a capacious colon, which in ancient times was seen as a status symbol for its ability to handle the introduction of the ever growing baculum of the domesticated horse
The infamous death of "Mr. Hands" (who, upon later genetic inspection, contained one of the highest percentages of Western Steppe Herder DNA among modern-day white people) is a clear indication of the downfall of the Aryan man.
But not all hope is lost: attracting the ire of much of the internet, the "Brony" subculture carries on the ancient tradition of ritual zoophilia--a quick Google search for "clopping" shows the Aryan spirit is alive and well.
Look how quickly the devious forces controlling our media ran to demonize these practitioners of the old ways! The greatest trick ever pulled on white women was being convinced that bronies are unappealing mates.
Reject modernity. Embrace tradition.
Consider the ancient depictions of Sleipnir, Odin's eight-legged horse. Eight legs would imply two baculum, the reception of which would be a feat only capable by the strongest God
The symbolism is equally clear in the many depiction of Apollo racing his chariot across the sky. For one man to survive the colonic onslaught of so many horses would imply spiritual divinity--made of "sterner stuff"
Even among the Romans, the equites--cavalrymen--were considered the second highest class of property owners in the republic. Only senators were higher.

Augustus was an equestrian. So influential was this class that even though he was a plebeian, he outranked countless patricians
European knighthood, too, was intricately tied to the possession of a horse. So much, in fact, that most languages' word for "Knight" translate to "rider" or "horseman"
It can be inferred from medieval manuscripts that the vast majority of them were participating in ritual sodomy with their horses.
You can follow @uncle_deluge.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: