Here is the key phrase that says bad vents will do harm.

Where as 2 weeks ago the govt was telling the consortia developing vents that speed was the priority. So of course they cut out features: "must" features only, and cutting the "should".

/2
This decision actually seems sensible. It is indeed important to have ventilators that meet the clinical need.

The question it poses is: why was the original UK ventilator competition spec too low for what was needed based on experience from China and italy?
/4
And why did the UK govt focus so much on the role of companies like Dyson, JCB, Rolls Royce, and the F1 teams which have never made a ventilator?

This is a specialist area....

/end
You can follow @CDlbcl.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: