I’ve been listening to your 3 most recent podcasts. Although I’m a subscriber and I follow you here on Twitter, I NEVER see your tweets. Why is that, Sam?

I am astounded and frustrated by the ignorance exhibited by you and your guests, in every case (but I admit to dozing off
during the current one, with Stanley McChrystal and Chris Fussell, who may have gone where I am).

If you paid attention to my tweets, emails, and essays, you would have a clearer understanding of:

(1) the implications of the Biden candidacy and the influence of the DNC,
(2) the reality of the pandemic and the necessity of our government’s being on a wartime footing,

(3) the ideal K-12 public school curriculum,

(4) personal shyness vs. public extroversion, how both are affected by the quarantine, and the nature of happiness, and
(5) when public humility should be abandoned, both during desperate times and when confronting the arrogance of ignorance.

I’ve come to the conclusion that just about everyone but me hasn’t a clue about what’s going on. Period. I’m not kidding, nor am I boasting.
It’s unbecoming to assert what I’m asserting here, but I’ve come to the conclusion that it MUST be said. Your interviews are with professionals, academics, military high muckey-mucks, and the like. At least 99% of the time, you all are exhibiting massive Dunning-Kruger delusions.
After the most recent podcast and the one preceding it, my deference and my patience disappeared in the face of what I see as my moral responsibility.

Your utter ignorance about Biden’s true nature — what would be castigated if attributed to Trump is treated as less culpable,
MUCH less culpable, if known of Biden — and indeed about the DNC is shameful. You can read more about it in my tweet threads, all of which come with attributions and links.

You are choosing the short-term benefit of Anybody-But-Trump over the long-term deficit of the DNC’s
stranglehold over the equally corrupt Democratic Party. Do you think for one moment that court-packing, e.g., is singular to the Republican Party; that should the Democratic Party be in the driver’s seat, they would hesitate for one second to apply their own litmus tests?
Abortion/Choice is a litmus test for both sides, and that’s just one example.

What are really and truly needed are impartial judges, critical thinkers who are capable of administering Solomonic justice within the dictates of a secular U.S. Constitution. That document demands
just one litmus test, that of impartiality unencumbered by religious dictates.

Take D.C. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan as a stellar example of such a judge. His handling of Michael Flynn, Trump’s first former National Security Advisor, has been estimable.
IMO, and knowing quite a bit about the facts in this case, Flynn is an out-and-out traitor. Read this link to familiarize yourself a little with the situation as it was 16 months ago, and know that Flynn has now changed his stance — from chastised, admitted liar to obdurate,
confident non-complier. Why so? Because Trump has signalled that a pardon is in the works. Nevertheless, the subject here is neither Trump nor Flynn, it is Judge Sullivan: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/dec/18/trump-michael-flynn-judge-emmet-sullivan-sentencing. Here’s some pertinent 4-1-1 on Judge Emmet Gael Sullivan, as upright and
unbiased a judge as can be found here in America: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmet_G._Sullivan.

As to the apparent Hobson’s choice of Anybody-But-Trump, I have written (and tweeted) much about the DNC’s machinations, starting 3 days before the South Carolina primary on 29 Feb, when longtime
Congressman Jim Clyburn endorsed Biden, thereby handing him the state.

Listen to Clyburn’s language as he dismisses Bernie’s proposals with typical anti-FDR rhetoric and throws his backing to a man in obvious mental deficit: https://fivethirtyeight.com/videos/why-south-carolinas-james-clyburn-is-endorsing-biden/. That was the Night Before
Christening. Now here’s the next day, Wednesday, 26 Feb 20, as recorded by C-Span: https://www.c-span.org/video/?469740-1/representative-jim-clyburn-endorses-joe-biden.

Starting on 29 Feb and ending on 10 Mar, 9 Democrats running for president dropped out and endorsed Biden; 2 more dropped out without endorsing … yet. I have a thread
delineating who exited and when, even including an endorsement from long-gone Beto O’Rourke. All of those people are intelligent, yet they threw their support behind a man who can’t utter one complete sentence out of ten.

I submit that this veritable coup was organized by the
DNC in order to oust Bernie once and for all. Do you not think that quid pro quos were not involved? See my thread on that subject.

Don’t dismiss me as a Bernie supporter, however. I am a supporter of his policies, so evocative of FDR’s New Deal, but he is morally incapable of
holding to what’s right in favor of politesse. I had once considered him the equivalent of Frank Serpico — the lone honest cop standing his ground while accosted on all sides — but he chose ”the short-term benefit of Anybody-But-Trump over the long-term deficit of the DNC’s
in Florida to vote in my state’s primary had I not voted early.

(Both Biden and the DNC kept urging us to go and vote … until last week’s travesty/tragedy in Wisconsin became a partisan issue, with the interference of TWO Supreme Courts, both siding with Republicans who
insisted on in-person voting — EXACTLY as the Democrats did … until Republicans intervened. Then both Biden and the DNC changed their tune, actually attempting to pull a Winston Smith ex post facto.)

I call that primary the St. Patrick’s Day Massacre. So far as I know, 3 poll
workers have tested positive to date (13 April 20), yet every single state health agency continues to refuse to release epidemiological tracking information on confirmed COVID-19 cases, the first one in my county having been dated at 20 Mar, only 3 days after the primary.
That’s too soon to have contracted it while voting but certainly within the time frame to have infected others, yet we are not allowed to know if any victims were voters or poll workers (aside from the 3 that have been reported by news sources). They all cite HIPAA regulations,
asserting that WHERE a possibly-infected person may have been — an anonymous person, at that — is ”personal” information.

SEE THREAD #2 since I’ve reached the 25-tweet limit on this thread. It would be easier if you paid attention to what I say, but here’s hoping you start to.
You can follow @hollis517.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: