The Original History of Bikram Sambat

Some people guess the Bikram era was from a foreign land and it was started from Madhya Pradesh of India. This is not true. Chandra Gupta II in the fourth century became king of Ujjayani. +1

He captured Ayodhdhya in around 400 AD and made his capital. He then pasted himself on copper coins as ‘Bikramaditya’. But the same Chandra Gupta declaring himself decorated Bikramaditya, but he was not being the originator of Bikram Samat. +2

In fact, since Gupta kings of Magadh were influenced by Lichchhavis of Nepal, Chandra Gupta I married a princess of Lichchhavis king. Therefore due to the influence of the bravery of Lichchhavi Kings, Chandra Gupta II might have decorated himself as ‘Bikramaditya’. +3

Still, the logic is not valid that Bikram Sambat started from India as Chandra Gupta II was decorated as Bikramaditya. The famous historian Baburam Acharya has written ‘During 58 BC when Bikram Era was begun, there is no proof of the existence of King Bikramaditya in +4

Ujjayani of India. No proof was established when of excavates of Ujjayani were studied.” In this situation, it is proved that Bikram Sambat is not a foreign Era. Bikram Sambat is the original and ancient era of Nepal. +5

In BS 1937, a literate researcher Pandit Bhagawan Lal Indraji from Gujrat India came to Nepal and searched and carried 23 different inscriptions. He believed that the era practiced by Lichchivis was the Bikram era. +6

Similarly, Radha Govind Basak, Professor of History at Calcutta University writes in History of Northern East part of India – ‘The era of Mandev 386 mentioned in the record of Changu is Bikram era. In this way, the era starting from 386 to 489 +7

(written in records at Chapali village) is the Bikram era. Historian Shankarman Rajbansi also believes that the era used by Mandev is also the Bikram era. So, there are so many proofs on the Bikram era. The era is traditionally being used in different states of India. +8

In Bengal of India, Panchangas based on solar theory in accordance with to Bikram era are in practice. Million copy printing newsweekly Future edited by Arun Bansal and Panchangas edited by Dr. Geeta Sharma; both based on the Bikram era are also being published. +9

Along with Bikram Era, the Nepal era was also practiced from Mid Lichchavis to nation builder Prithvi Narayan Shah and Rana regime.Since Tithis are unbalanced, for ease in administrative management Chandra Shamsher started to write the date of Bikram era as in AD(Isvi Sambat+10

In India Shaka Era was continually being disappeared. However in 1957 after the independence of India (1947) Prime Minister Jawahar Lal Nehru stated passive Shaka Era with belief that the era is of Indian origin. +11

But, since Shaka Era is also run with Tithis and has 354 days in a year, it was unpractical and could not go long run. Therefore India practiced AD (Isvi Sambat). Similarly compared to Bikram Era, the Nepal era could not be practical. +12

Bikram Sambat is based and had and has been following the rule and regulation of nature.Yogi Narahari Nath, a veteran literate and saint has mentioned that someone victorian King Bikramaditya according to Devmala Bansabali, had a throne at the place where now Ram Mandir +13

(Temple of God Ram at Battisputali of Kathmandu)has been constructed;and according to Pashupati Puran, the Bikram era was initiated during the regime of the first king of Suryabanshi(Sun descendent) Lichchavis, who ruled Nepal after their victory on Kirats, called as Dharmapal+14

or Bhoomi Barma or Bikramaditya.A study on Bhasa Bansabali, (Eds. Nayanath Paudyal) published by Department of Archeology, Government of Nepal) reveals that during the regime of King Dharmagat, on the name of the king a Chatarmukh Narayan (four mouthed statues of God Narayana)+15

along with a spout (now Narayanhiti) was created towards the south of the royal palace and open to pay pilgrimage. The Bansabali mentions this was a time when Bikram era was initiated and started to practice.+16

Lichchhavi king declaring himself Baishalipati (The King of Baishali) and due to the power of lord Pashupatinath, became the king of Kashi (Vanarashi) too. Bikram era was initiated when a brave and victorian Suryabanshi king established his capital at Bishalnagar +17

and Battaishputali (Himabatkhand). Here is another proof that the Bikram era was started in Nepal from an unknown ancient time. Just near above to a temple of Sankhu Bajrayogini there is another temple in which the head of King Bikramaditya has been kept. +18

And till the date, it is being worshipped by Bajracharya priests. It is a myth that King Bikramaditya ruled the Uttarapur state (now: Nala of Kavre district). A Bansabali at Harisiddhi temple established by Lichhchivi dynasty has quoted BS 711. +19

Harisidhdhi upapuran mentions that Harisidhdhi drama was demonstrated at BS 945.A Subarna Patra (gold plate) of the time of Jayasthiti Malla also mentions BS 1448. These all quotations prove that Bikram era was well practiced in ancient Nepal.
courtesy
Dirgha Raj Prasai
Kathmandu