Read on Twitter
This is a number these people keep spreading around, I have honestly only seen it on websites that are either anti-porn or selling a parental block. His source is Netnanny, which, for $80, says it can block children from seeing "dangerous content." Follow the fucking money. https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249437497161113600
Actually, this whole thread is so shit that I'm making a counter thread.
Here is how this user defines "addiction." Watching pornography once every three weeks. A little strict, but I'll go with it: https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249437504253517824
This tweet contains an image which the user claims explains porn addiction, I tried to find the webpage with this image, and I couldn't. However, I did find two articles that talk about porn addiction. https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249437508011728907
One from Healthline which does not follow his definition of addiction: https://www.healthline.com/health/pornography-addiction
And one from Addiction Center that does not follow his definition of addiction: http://addictioncenter.com/community/signs-of-porn-addiction/
When I tried to find the source of this image, I got the Wikipedia page for the band Heart: https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249437510863925249
These studies are bullshit by the way. The first one doesn't use the word "pornography" or "masturbation", the 2nd one says the effect only happens for up to an hour after organism, the third one is a paragraph and has no sources, the forth one says-- https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249437517486661632
arousal, not porn specifically. (I know, but still) And the fifth one has the same issue as the third one, because it's done by the same people.
The first study is so specific and inconclusive as to be laughable (seriously, read it if you don't believe me), the second one ends by saying more study is needed, and the third one is only true because Meth is known to-- https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249437520070352900
lower the sex drive of a user.
His source for this claim is an "alpha male" website called anti-dopamine, so I'm not taking this all that seriously. https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249437530874875904
His source for this is Verily, which is owned by Alphabet, which is also Google's parent company. Now I don't care about that, but-- https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249437542883241985
Hey buddy, if all these powerful interests are plotting to make us watch more porn, why have they given you all these useful numbers (that you in no way understand)? https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249437540245012481
The first article debunks his idea this was an attempt to get them addicted or something. It was an attempt to make them uncomfortable. Yes, it can be a weapon, but only when people like you are in power: https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249438276030693379
Read the line just AFTER the part you highlighted. The idea is, if it is found to be illegal, they'll report it. Believe it or not, the FBI doesn't like having its time wasted by people like you: https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249438281743376384
I'm not even going to respond to this one: https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249439342046720001
Also, that censoring words thing isn't cute or funny. Just saying.
Since when did these people give a fuck what the United Nations says? https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249439357116825602
The rest of this thread is general self-help bullshit so I'm going to end it here. So, in conclusion, Google Charles Keating sometime. (Oh, and remember, he was also a good friend of Mother Teresa)
