Read on Twitter
This is a number these people keep spreading around, I have honestly only seen it on websites that are either anti-porn or selling a parental block. His source is Netnanny, which, for $80, says it can block children from seeing "dangerous content." Follow the fucking money. https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249437497161113600">https://twitter.com/ReadLinko...
Actually, this whole thread is so shit that I& #39;m making a counter thread.
Here is how this user defines "addiction." Watching pornography once every three weeks. A little strict, but I& #39;ll go with it: https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249437504253517824">https://twitter.com/ReadLinko...
This tweet contains an image which the user claims explains porn addiction, I tried to find the webpage with this image, and I couldn& #39;t. However, I did find two articles that talk about porn addiction. https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249437508011728907">https://twitter.com/ReadLinko...
One from Healthline which does not follow his definition of addiction: https://www.healthline.com/health/pornography-addiction">https://www.healthline.com/health/po...
And one from Addiction Center that does not follow his definition of addiction: http://addictioncenter.com/community/signs-of-porn-addiction/">https://addictioncenter.com/community...
When I tried to find the source of this image, I got the Wikipedia page for the band Heart: https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249437510863925249">https://twitter.com/ReadLinko...
These studies are bullshit by the way. The first one doesn& #39;t use the word "pornography" or "masturbation", the 2nd one says the effect only happens for up to an hour after organism, the third one is a paragraph and has no sources, the forth one says-- https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249437517486661632">https://twitter.com/ReadLinko...
arousal, not porn specifically. (I know, but still) And the fifth one has the same issue as the third one, because it& #39;s done by the same people.
The first study is so specific and inconclusive as to be laughable (seriously, read it if you don& #39;t believe me), the second one ends by saying more study is needed, and the third one is only true because Meth is known to-- https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249437520070352900">https://twitter.com/ReadLinko...
lower the sex drive of a user.
His source for this claim is an "alpha male" website called anti-dopamine, so I& #39;m not taking this all that seriously. https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249437530874875904">https://twitter.com/ReadLinko...
His source for this is Verily, which is owned by Alphabet, which is also Google& #39;s parent company. Now I don& #39;t care about that, but-- https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249437542883241985">https://twitter.com/ReadLinko...
Hey buddy, if all these powerful interests are plotting to make us watch more porn, why have they given you all these useful numbers (that you in no way understand)? https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249437540245012481">https://twitter.com/ReadLinko...
The first article debunks his idea this was an attempt to get them addicted or something. It was an attempt to make them uncomfortable. Yes, it can be a weapon, but only when people like you are in power: https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249438276030693379">https://twitter.com/ReadLinko...
Read the line just AFTER the part you highlighted. The idea is, if it is found to be illegal, they& #39;ll report it. Believe it or not, the FBI doesn& #39;t like having its time wasted by people like you: https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249438281743376384">https://twitter.com/ReadLinko...
I& #39;m not even going to respond to this one: https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249439342046720001">https://twitter.com/ReadLinko...
Also, that censoring words thing isn& #39;t cute or funny. Just saying.
Since when did these people give a fuck what the United Nations says? https://twitter.com/ReadLinkola/status/1249439357116825602">https://twitter.com/ReadLinko...
The rest of this thread is general self-help bullshit so I& #39;m going to end it here. So, in conclusion, Google Charles Keating sometime. (Oh, and remember, he was also a good friend of Mother Teresa)
