I've received 2 messages that suggest I should clarify something about this thread. I think Bill's post is terrific; my comments relate to G and A being 'brilliant' prosecutors and how scholars (this evaluation of G and A is held by many if not most) come to these determinations https://twitter.com/pilabuda/status/1249301969983897600

I think it is worth pondering this question about 'performance' and how evaluations of performance shift over time, and this only amplifies Bill's other points about 'required skills'