Just preparing to start a new unit with my MA online students focusing on the idea of rethinking your practice. It's funny (and sad) that so much criticism and art history still fixates on artists and photographers being known for one particular technique or practice.

Like Maslow says, 'if all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail'. You shouldn't use a technique because you're already known for it, you should use because it illuminates what you want to talk about and engages your audiences with that subject.

One of the things that makes me happiest (but seems to frustrate many curators) is that my practice is very much about taking a complete about turn in technique from one project to another, I've traveled from the earliest types of phototo some of the most contemporary forms.

Here's to rethinking everything, basically.