šŸ¤¦šŸ¼ā€ā™‚ļøTHREAD: Just had a head-in-hands chat with my dad about a Coronavirus conspiracy theory he emailed me. Not having a go at him - heā€™s awesome. But the chat once again made me realise how dangerous these forwards are. Youā€™ve probably seen the message which looks like this:
The email claims the Coronavirus is a biological weapon unleashed by China. The writer points to ā€˜evidenceā€™ that no major Chinese cities have been affected by the virus and suggests the country may be hiding an antidote. After every statement it says ā€˜SOMETHING IS FISHY!ā€™
Not going into the flaws in logic or outright falsities of the email but hereā€™s how my dad (74,m) reacted when he got the email from a mate. ā€˜I read it and thought it was interesting so I forwarded it onto 5 people to see what they thinkā€™. But he didnā€™t ask for their opinions.
Dad says he thought it was ā€˜a bit dodgyā€™ but didnā€™t ask his mate who sent it to him where it came from. He didnā€™t see the problem with passing it on to maybe ā€˜start a conversationā€™. But I was the only person he actually talked to about it.
The partial email chain shows 14 people. If they did what dad did and sent it to 5 friends thatā€™s 70 otherā€™s who got it. If THEY did what Dad did thatā€™s 350 etc etc. No questions asked about veracity or source. Dad agrees itā€™s probably ā€˜not greatā€™ and ā€˜a bit harsh on the Chineseā€™
Dad says he realises how dangerous forwarding without questions is. Heā€™s an avid BBC News viewer/ listener but says he wants more reporting on this stuff. I told him we have an entire team on this full time (!). Clearly, as others have said, this is a cultural problem.
You can follow @joetidy.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword ā€œunrollā€ to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: