A quick check of http://clinicaltrials.gov  reveals 12 trials registered. Two are "expanded access" protocols, basically the compassionate use described in the @NEJM article.
Where are the RCTs for which we are hoping? Well, two are in China. I won't impugn their scientific validity without seeing final publication, but the protocols posted are a little sparse:

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04257656 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04252664
This is what should make your head explode – a massively-funded undertaking where we'll just throw more bad data at the question. This is where we rightly criticize pharma for failing to randomize.
You can have stopping rules, safety monitoring, etc. to help prevent a trial from moving forward in which harms are being observed in one of the arms, but this is not useful – except for safety, but that question can be answered in an RCT, as well.
Our best information may come out of France, which is testing multiple treatments – remdesivir, lopinavir/ritonavir, interferon beta-1A, and hydroxychloroquine – against each other in a large trial: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04315948
But, if you looked at this recent NEJM article and were hoping this were an isolated piece of uninformative data from a sponsored trial, history has not taught you well.

</thread>
You can follow @emlitofnote.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: