Today I conducted an experiment. I read DIARY OF A WIMPY KID.

The questions to be answered were twofold:

1. Could I see why the series is so popular?

2. Are they as dreadful in literacy terms as I fear?

1/
If you& #39;re an English teacher or invested in any way in whole-school reading, the phrase "Diary of a Wimpy Kid" probably triggers a reflexive eye-roll. You probably suspect the books of:

- a lack of challenge
- poor vocabulary
- a lack of thematic depth

2/
But...Could I explain the appeal of these books?

Yes. Definitely.

These are the sort of books that look easy to write but aren& #39;t. The tone is very cleverly and subtly judged. They totally nail a certain type of school experience and 11 year old voice.

3/
To make a sweeping but I think relevant comparison with Harry Potter:

The Harry Potter books are very school-positive. School is a wonderful escape in those books, a nurturing space, a ready-made family, full of growth and possibility.

Not so in DOAWK.

4/
School in DOAWK is naff. It is a series of greater and lesser humiliations to be survived. Lessons, learning and teachers are comparatively unimportant.

I like the viewpoint in this book. It& #39;s authentic. There& #39;s a lesson in there for us teachers.

5/
HP is what future teachers read. Wimpy Kid is the book for students who just aren& #39;t all that invested in school. It& #39;s the book for students whose anxieties and interests outside of the classroom are just that bit more pressing than the Learning Objective of the day.

6/
There& #39;s a heartbreakingly bleak moment in DOAWK in which our hero Greg, forced into acting as a Tree in the school production, refuses to sing the Tree song because his brother has a video camera, thereby derailing the whole show.

7/
The threat of social damage done by the video of a singing tree is far more important to Greg than his parent-pleasing "big moment".

It& #39;s all a bit sad. But the point is well made.

I teach a few of these kids. We all do.

8/
They don& #39;t have any particular academic aptitude, they don& #39;t attend clubs, they don& #39;t have girlfriends, they& #39;re not in the in-crowd. They would happily sit through a video lesson every lesson and never complain.

I& #39;m glad they have a series of books.

9/
Now the bad.

Question number 2: Are these books as awful for reader literacy as they seem at first glance? Are my English teacher prejudices justified?

This is the part where I tell you I was wrong this whole time?

Well...no. They& #39;re pretty bad.

10/
There is almost certainly no new vocabulary to glean from these books. Many of the sentences are non-standard.

But that& #39;s not what bothers me, really.

11/
I care more about the total lack of ambition or depth in the storytelling. The books are essentially a series of vignettes -- there is little to no "story" to follow. No mystery, no ambiguity, no symbolism.

I do, overall, think these things matter.

12/
Secondary students shouldn& #39;t really be reading the Diary of a Wimpy Kid series. Or they should read them once, quickly, and then move on to something better.

I don& #39;t necessarily agree that "as long as they& #39;re reading it doesn& #39;t matter what they read."

13/
Having said that, I do think they& #39;re quite cleverly executed for what they are.

14/14
You can follow @GCSE_Macbeth.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: