1. Deep distrust between state and society. State does not believe citizens will behave responsibly. Citizens don& #39;t trust instructions of the state. (2/7)
2. The state can afford to be more coercive than in liberal democracies with a vibrant public debate that is informed by experts. (3/7)
3. Citizens are used to the state be a source of repression and thus are more willing to accept repressive measures. (4/7)
4. The health systems are fragile due to 30 years of underinvestment and emigration. States cannot afford lighter measures. (5/7)
Not convinced by following arguments: -people are not disciplined (this is a effect, not a cause),- its just and autocratic reflex (otherwise
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="π·πΈ" title="Flag of Serbia" aria-label="Emoji: Flag of Serbia"> would be doing, but not
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="π²π°" title="Flag of Macedonia" aria-label="Emoji: Flag of Macedonia">
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="π½π°" title="Flag of Kosovo" aria-label="Emoji: Flag of Kosovo">) -lack of enforcement capacity (police per capita is greater in nearly all WB6). (6/7)
- its better than people dying. many other European countries reduce numbers with less repressive measures and many of the measures are counterproductive (limited times for mobility increases crowds). (7/7)