Religiosity of love. Like theistic religion, love operates on the same machinery. There are sects which value the actions of love, there are sects which value the proclamation of love. There are judgements on one's piety to love. There are disputes on what comprise love.

The fitness value of love religiosity, is the same as the fitness value of theistic religiosity. Virtual signalling, which is displays of one's piety, which is traditional words and acts of proclamation of one's love, serve to indicate solidarity to a shared ideal.

Men & women archetypically differ on their qualifiers of love. Such is difference of economics, and home economics; compassion through strengthening hardship versus compassion through comforting nurture. Fitness of societies measured by their application of contextual constraints

The theme of this thread, is that perhaps the correct perspective to take of love, is a fabrication that increases devotee fitness through shared displays of piety towards a mutualistic ideal, that the practice of actions alone do not matter, but the traditional displays do too.