Read on Twitter
For some reason, The Steele Dossier is back trending.
Remember: Buzzfeed published it against recommendations the same DAY the heads of U.S. Intelligence testified. https://www.c-span.org/video/?421334-1/senior-intelligence-officials-testify-russia-hacking-activities
Remember: Buzzfeed published it against recommendations the same DAY the heads of U.S. Intelligence testified. https://www.c-span.org/video/?421334-1/senior-intelligence-officials-testify-russia-hacking-activities
The Steele Dossier was funded by a variety of partisan players in both parties - it was never a USIC product.
But the MSM deliberately treated it like it was. And talked about it instead of this official report. https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf
But the MSM deliberately treated it like it was. And talked about it instead of this official report. https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf
Almost like the way the same MSM, especially digital "journalists," gathered anyone "resisting" Trump and conflated them with actual experts to dismiss the whole "Russia thing," along with "The Dossier."
Including the same one that published "The Dossier. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/charliewarzel/blue-detectives
Including the same one that published "The Dossier. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/charliewarzel/blue-detectives
So, if more finally emerges on how the narrative about Trump's foreign ownership was massaged by the MSM for years, don't let the make it about "The Dossier."
Discuss real intelligence products declassified properly in the public interest. </>
Discuss real intelligence products declassified properly in the public interest. </>
