WAIT A FUCKING MINUTE.

A reporter for Kotaku& #39;s caught lying to rape victims to publish details they were explicitly uncomfortable having published, and their response is "it& #39;s not our policy to edit articles we& #39;ve already published" before waiting 1/2 weeks to edit things out...

...and respect the people their reporting harmed. But they publish an opinion piece about how Final Fantasy VII& #39;s easy mode is too easy and gamers/Twitter users criticizing it is enough to get that edited the same day that it& #39;s published?

Why is the former group treated as safe to discount (and when part of your responsibility as a reporter protect the sources said reporting risks harming) where the latter is important enough to warrant an immediate response?

Context for the incredibly heavy first part:
http://www.nathalielawhead.com/candybox/what-its-like-sharing-your-metoo-with-kotaku-a-cautionary-tale
https://www.nathalielawhead.com/candybox/... href=" http://www.nathalielawhead.com/candybox/an-open-letter-to-game-journalists-metoo-fighting-with-surviving-abusive-reporting-and-the-fallout-of-not-caring">https://www.nathalielawhead.com/candybox/...