Read on Twitter
So apparently replying to @ChrisMartzWX and calling out his hypocrisy about being name-caller and if you will racists nature of it will get you blocked because why not? Mind you that this is a 16 year old kid who thinks he knows better then distinguished Profs and researchers. 1/
He claims to believe in Climate Change but yet denies everything that contradicts his opinion. He believes two anthropogenic warming deniers and that& #39;s about it. Almost every other tweet includes "they said snow was a thing of the past" or "It was 50 degrees warmer in 1950" 2/
Or something along those lines because he tries to reinforce his AGW denier views upon all of his tweets. Sure he some knowledge with regards to the weather, I& #39;ll give him that but that won& #39;t get you very far if you don& #39;t have the intangibles as well. 3/
Whenever someone confronts him in the comments about either him being biased or straight-up wrong, he either gets defensive or tries to deflect the blame to faulty data or the other party being biased. Debating against him must be real fun... 4/
When he tries to back his point he either comes up with anecdotal evidence that either doesn& #39;t have relevance or is outdated. In addition, he cherry-picks which data he uses to try and show his point is valid when in fact it is a horrible foundation. 5/
Whenever he did this and others pointed this out, he would point out that our theories or data is wrong. When questioned why our data is wrong, he& #39;d never explain why other than giving us research that was either a) biased b) irrelevant. 6/
