Read on Twitter
WHY UST's ECQ RESPONSE GUIDELINE IS ACTUALLY PRETTY GOOD – A thread:
I'll be explaining how the current set-up addresses student concerns, and some of the trade-offs that the admin had to consider in developing the Institutional Continuity Plan.
I'll be explaining how the current set-up addresses student concerns, and some of the trade-offs that the admin had to consider in developing the Institutional Continuity Plan.
Before we get down to my interpretation of the guidelines, I would suggest that you first go through this thread so you can understand the context and the different nuances of this topic. (1/n) https://twitter.com/lanznathanjohn/status/1248645173808001026?s=19
Also, if you want to respond, make sure to read through the entire thread because the issues are interrelated and I won't be able to address mental health in the same tweet where I'm addressing tradeoffs regarding academic excellence. 2/n
First: Compared to Other Alternatives
a. Mass promotion is not ideal for UST because we relatively have more programs with licensure exams compared to ADMU that doesn't have Accountancy, Architecture, Nursing, Civil Engineering etc. 3/n
a. Mass promotion is not ideal for UST because we relatively have more programs with licensure exams compared to ADMU that doesn't have Accountancy, Architecture, Nursing, Civil Engineering etc. 3/n
