I& #39;ve observed that media actually intended for teens (13-17) is lacking. YA is now always intended to "cross over." Teen shows are have the trappings of teen "stuff" (high school dynamics/activities/milestones), but adult behavior (/actors), for adult watchers (18-34 demo).
It seems like the people who are in the midst of their actual teens (14-16) are getting utterly left behind in entertainment and literature, with the exception of music (boy bands, man!).
I don& #39;t think this is because we "hate" teen girls. It& #39;s probably because teenage years are a brief time, and we decided the adult dollar is more reliable than the teen dollar (or teen attention span). But we& #39;re leaving money on the table and ignoring a gaping hole in the market.
We assume tweens/young teens will "read up," but without considering that 14-year-olds are reading about 17-year-olds acting like 25-year-olds (because the expected readers are in college or older). Which of two of those three ages are closer together?
I& #39;m not advocating for Bowdlerizing or discouraging adults from reading YA AT ALL, to be clear. I& #39;m not even saying we should change what "YA" looks like in the current market.

What I AM saying, is we should start a new Teen category and start filling the gap.
For whatever reason (read: arbitrarily/no reason at all), we decided MG and YA are two stools, and you can& #39;t try to sit on both. Fair enough!

What& #39;s stopping us from adding a third stool?
I think we forget that teenagers are...children? That& #39;s not a value judgment or condescension. They& #39;re children. That& #39;s an objective fact. Teens indulge in things that "middle grade" children love too. Sex is cool, but have you ever played Capture the Flag during summer break?
You can follow @AlyssaJennette.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: