My business and my organization are non-essential in DC. And yet, @WeWork suggested that we put our employees in harm's way because they "remain open."

How reckless and dangerous is it to suggest we flout @MayorBowser's order and come into our office?

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-08/wework-isn-t-paying-some-april-rent-as-it-seeks-landlord-relief
We proceeded to push back on @WeWork's ludicrous request, asking for a suspension of rent for an office space we are not allowed to use due to @MayorBowser's closure of non-essential businesses and @CDCgov guidelines.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-08/wework-isn-t-paying-some-april-rent-as-it-seeks-landlord-relief
Instead of providing relief for small businesses and organizations, @WeWork instead chose to "defer" our rent, prolonging payments for an office that we cannot use per @MayorBowser's orders for a later date.

How is this acceptable when WeWork isn't paying their own rent?
To be clear: Our WeWork representative has been nothing but helpful. It's beyond reprieve that her management puts her in this uncomfortable and indefensible position of taking advantage of their tenants during a global pandemic.

Especially when @WeWork isn't paying their rent.
Contrast this with @IndustriousHQ, where our office in Minneapolis is located, who gave us a 60-80 day suspension in rent due to @GovTimWalz's shelter-in-place order.

We will remember the way @WeWork chose to do business in a crisis and will never do business with them again.
You can follow @NickSSolheim.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: