NEO-ORIENTALIST SULTANATE ARCHIPELIGANISM:

a political philosophy

🏝️🏝️🏝️

by

John Sanilac
What need have we for a new political philosophy when there are already so many awful ones to choose from?
We find ourselves at a crossroads of history, faced with an imminent crisis that looms even larger than the shamelessly treasonous incompetence of Western elites:

The Simpocalypse.

πŸ’πŸ§Ÿβ€β™‚οΈπŸŒŠπŸŒŠπŸŒŠπŸοΈπŸ”₯
What is the Simpocalypse?

The near universal becoming-simp of modern man; the development of even our testosterone-drenched teenagers into gamers and virtual lickers at the bootheels of egirls they'll never meet.

πŸ‘³πŸ§žπŸ§žβ€β™€οΈπŸ’πŸ§Ÿβ€β™‚οΈ https://twitter.com/JohnSanilac/status/1247745876115591168
But is the Simpocalypse really such an unprecedented threat that it demands a new political philosophy?

Refer to the following graphs and judge for yourself. https://twitter.com/JohnSanilac/status/1244546393210937345
The World's Second Most Important Graph

by John Sanilac
When supercharged VR porn appears to compound the effects of social media and egirls, you will know that the end is very near.

The multiplication of simps will be almost palpable, on a month to month or even week to week basis.

πŸ‘³πŸ§žπŸ§žβ€β™€οΈπŸ’πŸ§Ÿβ€β™‚οΈ

https://twitter.com/JohnSanilac/status/1222397560347774978
There is only one possible outcome from the Simpocalypse, one that we, in our innocence, in this calm before the coming simp tsunami, can scarcely imagine: a return of polygamy, demanded by women in response to the dramatic shortage of available men. https://twitter.com/JohnSanilac/status/1243050409259753473
Impossible, you say, and undesirable too. Perhaps undesirable, but certainly not impossible!

How many years did it take for the Narrative to normalize gender transition? Three?

They're already hard at work on polygamy--recently rebranded as polyamory. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/03/style/polyamory-nonmonogamy-relationships.html
How will you know that normalization is imminent?

The Narrators will unleash the killer suffix, the thermonuclear weapon of rhetorical devices:

"-phobia."

After the word "polyphobia" appears in the Times, its days in polite society are numbered. https://twitter.com/JohnSanilac/status/1246652416465858560
Does any currently existing political philosophy have a plan to avert the Simpocalypse?

I think not, but give you my full encouragement to propose a strategy, provided it doesn't require unethical laws that violate universal human rights, such as a ban on pornography or egirls.
My dear female readers are turning aside from the absurdity of my prediction, emitting gentle and dismissive laughs that reveal, however, a slight undercurrent of fear at the unlikely but perhaps not completely impossible possibility... that the Simpocalypse will be all too real.
A likely timeline for the Simpocalypse is as follows.
It will be encouraged (sometimes subtly) by the usual heralds of the Narrative, and even promoted by advertisements from political interest groups. https://twitter.com/JohnSanilac/status/1238902003104772096
At the same time, the Narrators will normalize, promote, and encourage every type of non-traditional sexual arrangement, from inceldom to polyamory to... well, almost anything you can think of.

And likely DISCOURAGE traditional arrangements too! https://twitter.com/JohnSanilac/status/1242362809536499712
Second, a short time later, VR pornography will explode in popularity, and by consequence, young men will make an unprecedented exit from the mating marketplace.

(Note: I'm grouping both egirl and porn patrons under the term "simps." For our purposes here, they're the same.)
This will cause our already abysmal fertility to plummet suddenly and dramatically; the number of NEETs will explode as well.
The long term economic consequences of these trends are potentially dire.

At this point, you are thinking, the Narrators and Masters of the Universe will panic, and give marching orders to their propagandists to stop the tide.

But will they? Can they?

🌊🌊🌊🏝️πŸ”₯
For generations now, the goal of the Narrative has been the destruction of all social bonds and traditions that bind us together, to reduce us to individual, disconnected subjects, workers and consumers, who are rendered powerless by our lack of social cohesion.
Can the direction change just because a Simpocalypse is nigh?

It's not that easy.

In fact, I'm not aware of any examples in living memory where the basic direction has changed at all!
The dissolution of social bonds and traditions has a powerful momentum, because it's supported by the class interests of our psychopathic elites, and is, at the same time, a type of religion and moral crusade for an enormous flock of believers.
But the problem for our Masters of the Universe is that once they've destroyed all social bonds and turned us into individual working and consuming subjects... we lose all motivation to work and consume.

It turns out we were always, in some sense, working for each other.
To answer the question, NO, it's not possible for the Narrative to change course quickly enough to avert the Simpocalypse, because the interventions needed to do so conflict with its fundamental principles--and also because its incredible inertia would resist any sudden change.
So when the Simpocalypse arrives, there will be much hemming and hawing, but no effective solutions will be proposed. Most people will believe "surely this will pass, nothing bad can happen."

And the simp tsunami will roll on...

πŸ’πŸ§Ÿβ€β™‚οΈπŸŒŠπŸοΈ https://twitter.com/JohnSanilac/status/1237256622453350401
The fear in my female followers is growing as this thread spools on, is it not? They are now wondering to themselves whether this proposed event can, perhaps, be cancelled--or else postponed for so long that its fearful consequences would fall quite far from their fair selves.
You can follow @JohnSanilac.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword β€œunroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: