ok now let’s dive into this https://twitter.com/seokjimoon/status/1248068715272384513

so it isn’t even for twitter? it doesn’t work with twitter

it doesn’t let me check this complaint, it gives me a long list like this. old ones have twitter in the link https://twitter.com/seokjimoon/status/1248074481748279298

So actually it’s a one big compliant, and copyright claim 42 is the only one with tubget. and it is for BTS???

and there is no mention of twitter or t. co (both were in previous complaints)

so I requested an email to see full links. so that tubget links is a JK fancam, also it contains bts-twt. claim 452 (of 500) contains Happy Birthday, but it’s Anne Marie’s song, so it’s unrelated. no links to twitter or t. co as I mentioned.

so was the video restricted because of that one link with bts-twt? it’s from the site that was mentioned on the list of complaints received BTS. it looks like it was a BPI / Google LLC / idk mistake.

so BPI wanted to restrict a fancam that has something to do with tubget, but instead that vid was taken down. twitter isn’t even mentioned there :/

so this is the video and the link they wanted to take down. it works lol

the tweet https://twitter.com/sniper_jk0901/status/939841262672154624

LMAO “one (1) result was deleted because of a copyright complaint”. But the lumen database link shows our “copyright claim 42” page, so it should be about the tubget link, but it is literally the 2nd result and this link works

now I’m convinced that they took down a wrong vid... but why exactly this one????? AND WAIT IF THEY WANTED TO TAKE DOWN BTS RELATED CONTENT (basically, to protect BTS rights) DOES IT MEAN THAT THEY BLOCKED A BTS VID BECAUSE OF BTS KSDKKSKSKS

yes, I didn’t understand this thread too

note: those are just assumptions ofc, I might be right, I might be not
take this with a grain of salt, because I just googled everything I could