So, for an article by David Feldman, this piece is dreadful. One tiny paragraph alluding to the disproportionate focus on Labour. No acknowledgement of the reams of examples of false/exaggerated claims. The contrived linkage with anti-capitalist discourse. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/apr/08/education-labour-antisemitism-party-keir-starmer

Use of "rigged economy", we learn, opens the door to antisemitism, and is thus, presumably, to be avoided? Such, such bollocks. And surprising, because Feldman has actually been reasonable in the past. So how to explain the change in tone, emphasis and subtext? Hmm...

The answer to this is found in the paragraph beneath the piece itself. Specifically, this bit:

"This piece was written in collaboration with Ben Gidley..."

Ben Gidley. Also known as Bob From Brockley. A notorious purveyor of phoney AS smears and general menace.

A previous unravelling of this menace here: https://twitter.com/JoeSucksmith/status/737233081816469504?s=19

This thread is also highly revealing of Ben Gidley's a-priori takes on Labour antisemitism: https://twitter.com/bobfrombrockley/status/736545915121586176?s=19