Question for philosophy of science people:

Do you think a scientific hypothesis has any inherently significant scientific value?

I think a hypothesis has to go through at least some testing that support it before it even has any scientific value.
If a scientific hypothesis has inherent value without at least supporting tests, how is it any different from the opinions of my random auntie sending me an email she saw on Facebook?
You can follow @rasmansa.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:
There are a lot of misconceptions about the Turkish diaspora in Germany. Since i just finished writing an essay about this topic I thought it's time to give other people
Read more
Las mejores calculadoras online en 2020A thread http://totumat.com/2020/11/26/las-mejores-calculadoras-online-en-2020/ Cuando se estudian asignaturas que requieren de cálculos complicados, nada mejor que contar con una buena calculadora.
Read more
Mitigating #ClimateChange is as much about taking up new techs as about leaving others behindMost studies focus on #coal's global downfall but another #energy tech decline is loomingRead my new
Read more