Read on Twitter
I have never met so many people who can ignore the fact that the fandom is inherently zoophilic while also trying to push out the zoophiles. I just. I don't even know how people can operate like this.
On one hand, we have the fact the fandom started with raunchy conventions and animal comics. Yes, you can enjoy the fandom without being sexual, but if you deny the fact that sexualizing anthro animals is a large and lucrative part of the fandom you're fucking lying to yourself.
Not only that, but we REALLY DO have SEX TOYS designed to LOOK LIKE ANIMAL PENISES AND PUSSIES. FULL STOP. There are SEVERAL companies that go to most if not all furry conventions to pedal these toys and everyone is just ignoring this.
On that same hand, we have people that fuck animals. Zoophiles, animal rapists, what have you. They are sexually attracted to animals and animal genitalia. You all mean to tell me that the people that fuck the real animals are not okay but selling animal-based sex toys is okay-
-and the people who buy them and use them are okay? Okay. So given this, wild_life would be fine. Right? No. She's not fine because she fucked a dog 12 years ago. That I can understand except for several things that come up here.
Regardless of all the explainy victimy bullshit in that fucking diatribe, it has given us several pieces of information. No, we don't know if they're lies or not, but given the anonymous nature of the furry fandom we have to go off what we are given. Anyway
First thing we know is that she fucked that dog 12 years ago. I do not condone fucking the dog. That's basically rape and that's awful and disgusting. But it was 12 years ago.
From what I gathered (which isn't much) and assuming that what she sad about law enforcement/authorities being involved is true, that is more than 4 times past the statute of limitations in her state. It's water under the bridge. In addition to this, it has been Twelve Years. 12.
If I looked at someone's criminal history and they had a misdemeanor for something 12 years ago with no other infringements I would be inclined to, you know, believe they changed. This is even an unjust argument because authorities were notified and she was not charged!!!
Before someone says it, that's not a good thing. Hold on. We will get there, believe me. Back to the point. She goes further to talk about the other dogs she has/had. The only other dog she could have done anything sexual with died 2 years ago. Passed the statute of limitations-
-this year, wow! Her final dog couldn't have been involved in anything assuming that it's true that he was neutered. There are no convictions. No ceasing of animals. And no concrete evidence that no further bestiality took place beyond the initial claims. Not only that but-
-she mentions that her current sex toys and relationship have, "quelled [her] impulses to search out real life ... situations that [she] once felt an urge to pursue." Is that not a net positive or at least neutral thing? I am not saying that we need to applaud someone for not-
-fucking the dog, but would this not make a for a logical reason why we could, oh I don't know, stop stalking and harassing her? It's possible to block someone and move on with your life. "Oh no," say you, "she still uses the toys and has urges and that isn't okay at all!"
This is where we get to the other hand-- the minors who were and are quite literally duped into being a "furry" and have now grown up to realize that this community, gasp, has zoophiles!! (I myself could be included in this group so sit down and shut up)
This has been going on for YEARS. All of yall have been complacent with the idea of surrounding yourself with possible animal abusers because of the, "some people are like that but not EVERYONE" line. "I'm not like one of THOSE." We're all called furries. Not us furries and them-
-other furries. It's furries, period. It goes without standing that if the majority of cons have booths that sell this kind of paraphilia gear and no rules that ban this kind of paraphilia gear, then the majority of the con-goers are okay with that. You've been okay with that.
"Nonono, I'm not okay with that. Feral porn is bad, bad dragon toys are bad, none of these people are TRULY furries and we need to kick them out!"
This does not make sense. I know that this thread is all over the place but this really does not make sense. At all.
This does not make sense. I know that this thread is all over the place but this really does not make sense. At all.
At some point and time, you decided to join a fandom with a well-documented history in adult themes and zoophilic tendencies under the guise of it being a small number of people who engaged and supported such things. This probably happened in your formative years so I cannot-
fault you for believing it. If you were lucky enough, during these years you were also able to go to furry conventions, where examples and traces of these fixations and behaviors were put on display for at minimum 3 days and 2 nights straight.
Yall slept on all of this. The groomers, the animal fuckers, the paraphilia gear, the pedophiles, yall were all fucking complacent. You guys knew. The people you hung out with knew. You are ALL cowards. Even worse, you're cowards that cannot seem to formulate a single opinion on-
your own. I have come to the conclusion that yall only stand up for your "morals" when it's convenient. You're all fake. Those of you I'm addressing are guilty of bandwagoning for justice, and yet you can't even logically apply these "morals" that you have! Everyone has to be-
spoonfed an opinion on a topic and if enough people support it then that's what you believe. Take feral porn. It's bad because it depicts animals having sex, and being aroused by the sight of drawn feral animals having sex makes you a zoophile. This would also make the whole-
animal sex toys and fucking animals thing not okay. But the thing is, what makes feral porn not okay? The fact that they look like real animals? So, that would make all anthro porn drawn in a realistic style not okay. It looks too close real life and being aroused makes you a-
zoophile, right? No? Okay, so how about they're on all 4s and they look like real animals. So now all anthro doggystyle porn is bad because they look like real animals, right? No? Is it because of the genitalia? Then what about all the yiff that has anatomically correct sex bits?
