Shri Rama hasn't sent Mata Seeta on exile to uphold his Raj dharma but to uphold his pati/pitra dharma

{THREAD} (1)

As Ramayan is re telecasting and soon the so called episodes of agni pariksha and mata's exile are going to air which will be followed by questions/statements questioning the decision of Lord Rama So I took it to twitter to give you a perception and insight to the decision (2)

DISCLAIMER : Only for practical and open minded people we are going to deal with some harsh alternate reality/realities , thread is going to be long bear with me! (3)

Being a girl, I "was" one of those people who questioned shri Rama as a husband because of his decision of sending mata seeta on exile and yes the infamous so called Agnipariksha.

There are different people with different views on this matter (4)

Some says :

He fulfilled his Raj Dharama

He took wrong decision

He did injustice

He was extreme patriarch

He was misogynist p*g(e. g. Audio Truck) (5)

I used to think that he took a wrong decision and did injustice with her.

Ya ya you're right result of it was the result of a propaganda and ignorance but I am a critical thinker so I did it a thought and came up with this idea : (6)

: "If you want to know whether a decision was wrong or right just do one thing remove that "decision" and then imagine the scenario if scenario becomes good for the "affected person(AF)" decision was wrong and if it becomes worse then decision was right!

Here AF=seeta (7)

Yes yes that thing "agar esa hota to kaisa hota? "(AEHKH idea)

"If this would have been the case what would have been the scenario? “

DISCLAIMER : I am not going to use exact statements while narrating story so please pardon me! (8)

Let's first discuss the so called Agnipariksha :

After war when Lord Rama first met mata seeta he said some very ugly and harsh words to her and he said he can't accept her as now her character is somewhat questionable! (9)

(Please note here, why lord Rama(basically people) questioning the character/chastity of Seeta and not holding ravana accountable for their nasty doubts it's because because of shrapa Ravana was unable to do anything forcefully!)

Let's continue, (10)

After hearing Rama's words mata seeta decided to end his life by burning herself in fire.

Now notice that when she was about to step in fire or when she stepped (IDR) lord brahma shiva and many more arrived there and asked lord Rama, " why are you behave like a commoner?.. (11)

.. You're almighty you know Seeta is pure!

(The point to note here is God themselves vouched for maa sita)

Rama said, "I know that and I did this because of "talks in society".

Look here we know lord Rama never doubted mata sita "himself"

(12)

Then question arises why he said those things? to please society?

NO! He did this to give a befitting reply to the society! Now please don't tell me only Bollywood actresses are having right to befitting reply :D

Gods themselves gave that befitting reply to the society!(13)

Now let's apply the idea of AEHKH to so called Agnipariksha!!

What would have been the scenario??

People have character assassinated Mata Seeta!!

But but they still questioned her chastity??

No you're wrong, I am not talking about those people right now!

Then? (14)

The people who celebrated/supported the nude painting of goddess Sarswati on the name of artistic liberty, yes yes you're right the same people,the torch bearer of feminism, women's right, patriarchy smasher yes you're absolutely right so called feminist and liberals.. (15)

.... would have been supporting the remarks questioning chastity of mata seeta on the name of Freedom of Speech!

Question questioning the character of mata Seeta would have been getting entertained on the name of possibility by like Romila Thappar and Audio turkey. (16)

(If any of you is going to deny above and below possibility by even 0.1% you're probably highjy ignorant or fall in the above mentioned group!)

Look guys be real and practical if Rama wouldn't have addressed the issue questioning the chastity of Maa Seeta then not only....(17)

.... ayodhavaasis but also present day intellectuals/historians would have been character assassinating her on the name of possibilities /theories .There would always have been a question about her chastity(be real)!

Shri Rama was the man with foresight! (18)

Even now people questions her character by questioning the parents of luv and kush just to call rama impotent yes you're right again the same people who call Hinduism misogynist, extremely patriarchal and anti women yes you're right as always the infamous "Meem-bheem" gang.(19)

Even when there are two clear cut in indents of clarification of the nasty propaganda, imagine what would have been the case if Lord Rama would not hav converted that question mark into full stop. (20)

Shri Rama performed his pati dharma by diverting every potential filthy remark directing on mata Seeta on himself.

He became villain himself here for significant number of people but protected mata seeta from every kind derogatory remarks!! (21)

Now question comes why he abandoned her even after the clarification!

Now again apply that AEHKH idea!

Mata Seeta would have been living a luxurious life in Ayodhya but full of disrespect, ppl would have been insulting her, questioning her even claim of luv kush of the...(22)

......throne would have been challenged!

Now answer this
If you're living in a society where your better half is getting insulted every single day what will you do?

Think

Think

Think. (23)

Before I proceed further let me tell you one thing Ram was accountable for the happiness, life, luxury, business opportunity of his praja but in no way he was bound to leave her wife for the sake of their satisfaction atleast for sure it wasn't compulsion! NO Way (24)

@desimojito
@coolfunnytshirt
@AgentSaffron
@Pokershasha

So I believe by now you have a answer what you will do!
Some will say I will try to convince my society that their view/thoughts are wrong

Most will say I will leave that society along with my better half! They don't deserve him/her. (25)

For those who want to convince answer is God themselves vouched for the chastity of mata seetha but they still abused her if this couldn't convince them what will?

So only option Rama had was to leave Ayodhya along with mata seeta but being a king Ram couldn't do that. (26)

Raj dharma > family

Asking lord Rama to step down from raj dharma is like asking an on duty fauji(soldier) to return home for family.

For soldier
Duty > family

For king
Raj dharma > family. (27)

Rama took every filth over himself, took tags like misogynist, selfish,extreme patriarch, regressive and what not but saved not only m Seeta but luv kush also from harassment, insult etc etc etc.

Ram may have failed to give them luxuries life but he gave them respectful life 28)

Indeed lord Rama is purushottam!!

Jai siya Ram

As you're reading this you may also listen this.

Beautiful song!

My favourite!!

I just read it there are many typos!
Pardon me!!

Do watch this video too there are very high possibility that these incidents never happened but added later, reason of addition is same people must have said bad things about her and to clarify things they may have added things https://twitter.com/theskindoctor13/status/1249245029391986688?s=19