A lot of the discourse about 'no rallies' makes less sense outside of America where the state is also an Empire with basically guaranteed monopoly of violence. I think the British State is more vulnerable to Direct Action than some think.

Peter Hitchens did a recent interview where he said the London Riots were just people realising how feeble the British state was.

In America, even if you somehow took over a medium sized town or the capital city, there's still thousands of miles of different states and different coasts left. Its just too big to coup.

The UK on the other hand is small. Its easy to see that if someone did a Beer Hall Putsch in a medium-sized city, it could easily spread.

Can you actually imagine your local British police force dealing with a group of people unafraid of prison with a conscious plan to defeat them? Frankly I can’t.

Eternal reminder that the Catlan seperatists trapped the entire Barcelona police with nothing but trucks. This was done by barely organised people with no plan, imagine if these tactics were carried out by a group with the pure intent of causing chaos.

The goal of a revolution isn't to become the new government by defeating all their units. Obviously that's LARPy, its about increasing the lag between government intent and reprisal to such a length that the shadow-play of power breaks down.

You don't need to defeat the SAS or something. You need to defeat the guy behind the desk, who has spent his whole life as a cog in a machine and now suddenly has to make an actual decision for which all his prior training says he will be blamed.

You're essentially creating a reserve of chaos from which anyone can then draw, not pointing guns at civil servants.