Read on Twitter
Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers (Doyle-Moynihan) Given the now daily presence of Dr. Birx & Dr. Fauci in our lives and the fact that Dr. Birx is US head of PEPFAR and US representative to the board of the Global Fund, let's navigate these paths in re Clinton Fdn (stick with me)
A review of PEPFAR (President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief) In Country Operational Plans: https://www.state.gov/country-operational-plans/#fy2007 from 2007-2018 indicates that there were 1,511 references to the CFdn and/or CHAI (Clinton HIV/AIDS Initiative; Clinton Health Access Initiative) in those plans.
Lots of engagement. By year, the numbers look as follows: '07/68x; '08/293x; '09/474x; '10/237x; '11/55x; '12/147x; '13/160x; '14/4x; '15/26x; '16/36x; '17/16x. So what do we see here? During #HillaryClinton tenure as Secretary of State, (recall that she controlled the
purse strings for USAID inc PEPFAR), the Clinton Foundation worked 'in partnership with', 'in concert with', 'along with' a total of 913x of 1511 total = 60% of Total Interactions. Did somebody say 'conflict of interest'? Recall once again that there was no IG In State during
HRC's tenure. I can guess why President Obama allowed that to happen but we don't guess. Back to the data. What countries represented the greatest action for the CF? Nigeria, 232x; Zambia 135x; Uganda 102x; Ethiopia 95x; India 93x. Who (pardon the pun) was head of Ethiopia
Ministry of Health ('05-'12) and chair of the Global Fund ('09-'11) at this time? Current WHO chair Dr. Tedros. How convenient. I am pleased to see @realDonaldTrump heavily critique #WHO earlier this afternoon. Hopefully he might read our materials here @LWDoyleUSA. A review of
many of the grants from the PEPFAR link above indicates that the CFDn and CHAI were often working in concert with many of the following organizations: #HarvardUniversity, #ColumbiaUniversity (Mailman School of Public Health), Health Alliance International (affiliated with the
#UniversityofWashington, Boston-based Institute for Healthcare Improvement. These universities and 501c3 charities were all part of what was designated in late 2002 (a full 2 years before the Clinton Library was completed) as the Clinton HIV/AIDS Treatment Consortium.
Where was the IRS approval for this activity as required of any public charity that looks to change its mission and purpose which was strictly for the building of a presidential library? This is the key question to solving the Clinton Foundation? Where is this approval? But I
digress for purposes of this thread. Let's follow the money. Harvard saw its US government grants (aka PEPFAR) increase by 45% to almost $700mm/yr ( https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/display_990/42103580/2012_06_EO%2F04-2103580_990_201106) Looks like it pays to be friends with the Clintons. Although upon reflection, I think the folks at Harvard
have intentionally distanced themselves from the Clintons given that they make no reference to the fact that Harvard was a member of this Clinton HIV?AIDS Consortium in any of their promotional highlights ( https://aids.harvard.edu/timeline/ ; http://archive.sph.harvard.edu/now/20080605/milestones-at-hsph.html) Why would Harvard
distance themselves? Great question but one doesn't distance because things were great. How about #Columbia? How much do re mi did they accrue during this time frame? Oh my!! Looks like Columbia's government grants increased by ~55% to almost $900mm/yr ( https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/display_990/135598093/2012_07_EO%2F13-5598093_990_201106)
during this time period. The Columbia crowd and the Clintons remain close friends as Chelsea is on the faculty of the Mailman School ( https://www.mailman.columbia.edu/people/our-faculty/cc3459). We call this 'the gift that keeps on giving.'
In regard to the smaller Seattle-based and UofW-affiliated charity known
In regard to the smaller Seattle-based and UofW-affiliated charity known
as Health Alliance International ( https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/display_990/943047981/2009_12_EO%2F94-3047981_990_200812) they experienced an increase in revenues of approximately 50% after joining the Clinton consortium. A review of emails and documents sourced from foreign donors reveal that HAI actually were the 'boots on the ground'
so to speak for the Clinton Foundation in Mozambique. That info along with the fact that the CF was acting as an agent for Mozambique and for other foreign govts in other locales is where the rubber meets the road. 'Acting as agent' is in violation of IRS Code and subjects the CF
to loss of their tax-exempt status. Clear as day: (page 5/36; https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/eotopick92.pdf) Paul Manafort is sitting in jail right now with one of the charges related to acting as a foreign agent ( https://www.lawfareblog.com/paul-manafort-guilty-plea-highlights-increased-enforcement-foreign-agents-registration-act) Oh, what happened to the CF's partners from Health Alliance >
International in Mozambique? Glad you asked. An internal audit pointed to fraud by subcontractors (aka kickbacks and payoffs) ( https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/health/uw-international-aids-nonprofit-hit-by-financial-questions-in-mozambique/)
Who was the individual
Who was the individual
who orchestrated this Consortium for the Clintons? An individual named Donald Berwick formerly of the Boston-based Institute for Healthcare Improvement. IHI saw its revenues increase by 50% after joining the Clinton HIV/AIDS Treatment Consortium. Berwick participated on President
Clinton's Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection and Quality in Healthcare Industry ( http://www.ihi.org/education/IHIOpenSchool/resources/Pages/ProfilesInLeadershipDonBerwick.aspx) If Berwick is such a leader consumer protection and quality in healthcare then where was he when Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals was polluting the developing world w/ garbage
drugs ( https://fortune.com/2013/05/15/dirty-medicine/) while being a partner with the Clinton Foundation ( https://www.clintonfoundation.org/main/news-and-media/press-releases-and-statements/press-release-agreement-on-major-reduction-in-price-of-aids-drugs.html) Smell a rat yet? But back to the question as to Berwick and what was he doing during this period? Probably more focused on seeing his comp go from $382k in 2000-2001
before he got in bed with the Clintons (page 19/40; https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/display_990/383017223/2002_04_EO%2F38-3017223_990_200104 ) to $2.3mm in 2008. THAT"S RIGHT, $2.3mm although IHI did implement a deferred comp plan so even still his average comp was near $1mm during this time frame. Nice work if you can get it.
Add it all up and what do we have? Garbage drugs leading to certain increased levels of drug resistance; Ivy-league universities scoring huge US government grants (how did they miss the fact that Ranbaxy was distributing garbage drugs?); fraud within Clinton partners and also as
we have highlighted previously fraud between the US State Department and the Global Fund; and 'people getting paid' under the guise of charity. I guess we should not be surprised at all this malfeasance given that there was no IG at State during HRC's tenure. All of which beg the
following questions among others:
1. How's Dr. Birx managing PEPFAR in light of this background? 2. What is going on at IRS?
My partner and I appreciate your support. Our fight is your fight. Pls continue to share/retweet our work. Thank you. #AmericaWorksTogether #DigitalArmy
1. How's Dr. Birx managing PEPFAR in light of this background? 2. What is going on at IRS?
My partner and I appreciate your support. Our fight is your fight. Pls continue to share/retweet our work. Thank you. #AmericaWorksTogether #DigitalArmy
