Read on Twitter
I agree with a lot of this piece in @tribunemagazine.
Not least:
“The only hope that the Labour Left has of asserting itself in the coming years rests in finding a unity of purpose which builds a formidable socialist voice in the party...”
1/2 https://tribunemag.co.uk/2020/04/rebuilding-the-labour-left">https://tribunemag.co.uk/2020/04/r...
Not least:
“The only hope that the Labour Left has of asserting itself in the coming years rests in finding a unity of purpose which builds a formidable socialist voice in the party...”
1/2 https://tribunemag.co.uk/2020/04/rebuilding-the-labour-left">https://tribunemag.co.uk/2020/04/r...
2/2
But I don’t agree with this:
“The path to a renewal of the Labour Left runs first through Momentum...”
IMO, Momentum is a tarnished brand.
We need A group, yes, but not Momentum.
Look at the response to it; there’s much hostility.
To move forward we have to break away.
But I don’t agree with this:
“The path to a renewal of the Labour Left runs first through Momentum...”
IMO, Momentum is a tarnished brand.
We need A group, yes, but not Momentum.
Look at the response to it; there’s much hostility.
To move forward we have to break away.
Addendum:
The name ‘Momentum’ is now a negative in itself. That’s a problem.
Our “renewal” has to be separate to it.
IMO.
The name ‘Momentum’ is now a negative in itself. That’s a problem.
Our “renewal” has to be separate to it.
IMO.
Addendum addendum!
The reality is: Momentum has upset, alienated and annoyed a cross-section of the party for varying reasons and to varying degrees.
Some great work initially but it lost its way because, imo, EGO got in the way.
What’s in a name? Momentum is now bad.
The reality is: Momentum has upset, alienated and annoyed a cross-section of the party for varying reasons and to varying degrees.
Some great work initially but it lost its way because, imo, EGO got in the way.
What’s in a name? Momentum is now bad.
