Such an eerie view. Public comment is beginning. If you'd like to call in, dial (669) 900-6833 and use Meeting ID number 459 499 150. Then press #, and press # again when prompted for ID.
After 10 minutes of "hello, can you hear me" caller asks if he could be told what's on the agenda.

@CD6Nury Just announced they are having technical difficulties. It's going to be a long day, folks. Buckle up.
In a city that proudly participates in the Great Shakeout and other disaster preparedness events, how we did not plan to continue governance through emergency periods remains a mystery https://twitter.com/EstebanCortante/status/1247582131385036800
They're in recess for 15 minutes. That public comment was so broken up by 'can you hear me nows' and people talking over each other was a real disservice to the few folks we could hear who were in distress and concerned about losing everything.
In the meanwhile, some of the motions councilmember Mike Bonin is introducing today. This asks for the reclassification of unpaid rent as consumer debt, which still would be collectable but not via eviction.
This motion is meant to address the loopholes created by the do-no-harm-to-landlords approach to eviction prevention:
The Judicial Council ruling yesterday (see article at top of thread; excerpt below) helps fill some of those same gaps that city council was unwilling to, but it still doesn't address the rent/mortgage debt that might push folks into the streets when the emergency passes.
So councilmembers propose leveraging the Responsible Banking Ordinance to offer renters and mortgage holders relief...
[a previous tweet was deleted because of a potential change to co-signers on the motion... it's all in flux, folks, sorry]
gonna try to insert this into the stream so the thread isn't disrupted https://twitter.com/sahrasulaiman/status/1247600173083021313
https://twitter.com/sahrasulaiman/status/1247601786203987969
...hence the need for real protections that center the realities of the most vulnerable folks who are the least likely to know their rights or have access to legal assistance. https://twitter.com/mikebonin/status/1247570386968969216
Returning to the Responsible Banking Ordinance for a second...it was first passed in 2012 to address issues stemming from the 2008 crash. It required banks doing business w/ the city to disclose detailed data on loans & foreclosure activity by community. https://www.latimes.com/local/la-xpm-2012-may-16-la-me-0516-banking-ordinance-20120516-story.html
But it was never implemented. It was amended in 2018, in the wake of the Wells Fargo fake accts scandal (where employees ordered credit cards for pre-approved customers w/out their consent and created fraudulent checking & savings accts, sometimes moving $ out of legit accts).
I'll be honest and say I don't know the extent to which an ordinance aimed at transparency and more community-oriented banking practices can be leveraged to seek rent/mortgage suspension, but we'll cross that bridge when we get there.

We now return to the mtg in progress...
You can follow @sahrasulaiman.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: