1. See here: https://twitter.com/shadihamid/status/1242049228525973504?s=20">https://twitter.com/shadihami...
3. Caveat at the risk of sciolism- (the practice of opinionating on topics one has superficial knowledge)- the post talks about the impact of the pandemic; not how the virus behaves. I have found this book immensely helpful. https://www.hurstpublishers.com/book/the-pandemic-century/">https://www.hurstpublishers.com/book/the-... @honigsbaum @hurstpublishers
4. I have been working on the story since it broke- and kept my eye on big tech and now present some articles and issues that I thought was helpful. There is a perception that democracy is being undermined by autocratic or authoritarian governments like China and Russia.
6. The worry is with the increasing role of big tech in combatting this crisis and the undue influence big tech firms may exercise on the government after the pandemic. Now, if you& #39;re China that is not an issue: you can control the tech firms, but as a democracy thats a problem.
8. Western democracies have been cognisant of even before the pandemic. See Huawei issue in UK, the Gupta brothers scandal in South Africa, Jeff Bezos touting for government work and UK and the backlash following Cambridge Analytica scandal- https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/feb/19/us-very-concerned-over-huaweis-role-in-uk-5g-network">https://www.theguardian.com/technolog...
10. With pandemic tech companies are being embraced. They appear to be responsible citizens. Facebook is informing you about Covid, whilst Google, not unlike Putin, will track people’s movement to help public health chiefs. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-52121264">https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/tech...
11. Arguably, Western democracies finding it difficult to deal with the population lockdown. They cannot simply order a China style lockdown and so turn to tech companies to solve their problems. But that has a price: ethics are put on the back burner. https://www.businessinsider.com/palantir-employees-ice-petition-alex-karp-2019-8?r=US&IR=T">https://www.businessinsider.com/palantir-...
14. In 1956, Phillip K. Dick wrote a short story called “Minority Report”, and warned against a world where crimes can be predicted. Fast forward to 2020: Robert Muggah writes glowingly of this ‘Dickish’ vision: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/06/cities-crime-data-agile-security-robert-muggah/">https://www.weforum.org/agenda/20...
15 But Muggah also raises the ethical issues involved in using such technology. It needs checks and balances and a transparent framework to operate within. But to do that requires a totally different governmental architecture.
16. But what happens when Google Health become part of the NHS infrastructure or Zoom conferencing become intrinsic to the UK government with its China-based engineering team? Can Western liberal democracies remain independent? https://healthtech.blog.gov.uk/2020/03/28/the-power-of-data-in-a-pandemic/">https://healthtech.blog.gov.uk/2020/03/2...
18. What happens when even the mundane is informed by big tech firms? These days even premiership teams rely on EA sports FIFA football game for data on a player. Perhaps big tech is already here to stay, and the pandemic is a catalyst. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/dec/21/fifa-video-game-changed-football">https://www.theguardian.com/technolog...
19. After the pandemic, Western democracies will be faced with an immense challenge. We may shop differently, give away our data with more ease, accept unquestioningly the firms’ inherent benevolence just like we accepted state expansion into our private lives last century.
20. Defence of the Realm Act 1914, regulated everything from buying alcohol to flying kites, we never got rid of the passports or repealed the licensing laws after the war. These are a permanent fixture of our lives. Similarly, consider the sweeping laws introduced after 9/11
21. Now, under the threat of a new national emergency, we are being asked to accept not only restrictions on our freedoms but also big tech. If we are not careful the balance between government and the big tech firms may tilt towards the latter and they may capture the State.
22. On the other hand, if we start creating the structures to regulate them, give them and indeed us, a ‘social contract’ if you will, then government will remain in the hands of the people as opposed to the nerdy CEO with his unbuttoned shirt and his shareholders. - End Thread.
You can follow @tamhussein.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: