Read on Twitter
This is a dangerous work of misinformation. The medical community is NOT divided on #chloroquine. Some may be giving it to patients, but this is Hail Mary compassionate use. Repeat. There is no solid data to support this drug's use for #coronavirus. 1/ https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/06/us/politics/coronavirus-trump-malaria-drug.html?action=click&module=Spotlight&pgtype=Homepage
. @peterbakernyt @maggieNYT @katierogers @davidenrich should have read this before doing this piece. This is the advice given to doctors by doctors. For god's sake, can you for once NOT do a both-sides story on something important like this!? 2/ https://annals.org/aim/fullarticle/2764199/use-hydroxychloroquine-chloroquine-during-covid-19-pandemic-what-every-clinician
Other reporters did their due diligence before writing on this drug. Why couldn't one of the four of you get it together to do so? 3/ https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2020-04-01/trump-chloroquine-coronavirus-bad-science-hiltzik-column
I'm sorry to be criticizing again. But you got this wrong, way wrong and will confuse many readers, perpetuate false medical information in a pandemic. end/
