Now that I'm awake on regular Kenyan time.

I skimmed Wilderson's forthcoming book. With the same skill and energy I used to skim books in grad school and after.
Also, with the very same reservoir of knowledge I use to read other books.

And with the same brain.
If you have not read the book or skimmed it, I think you should reserve judgment.
Based on my skimming, I think the title is misleading, and that it promises something the book cannot deliver.
Were I very generous, I'd say the book is something like Audre Lorde's biomythography.

Unlike Lorde's work, though, it misrecognizes its genre and purpose.
I think books find their audiences, and those audiences are helped by those books.

I hope this book will find its audience. I am not its audience. That's okay.
And I hope that even as the book finds its audience, we have the grace to hold on to Lorde's lesson: we work across difference with people who share the same goal. Freedom.
Because, honestly, getting into weird fights over x or y theoretical school because we cannot learn the *difficulty* of working across difference is silly.

Silly is the best word I have.
It seems I have a little more energy!
I think it's dangerous to title a memoir after a theory.

We're already seeing that confusion, where those who critique the memoir we've read or skimmed are being accused of misunderstanding and critiquing the theory. And the person now *embodied* as the theory.
Anyhow, you're clever people and can probably figure out the range of complications that will arise in such a scenario.
I am now going to eat cake.
Also, please see the beginning of this thread and note *where* I am tweeting from.

I have zero stakes in U.S. institutional politics and hierarchy policing. Zero.
You can follow @keguro_.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: