Also known as, governors can& #39;t just unilaterally change the election laws by fiat, allow ppl to vote after the election& #39;s over, & censor news about the election results--all w/out statutory authority. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19a1016_o759.pdf">https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/... https://twitter.com/davidlnoll/status/1247305355400527872">https://twitter.com/davidlnol...
The "majestic generalities" in question being the democratic process, the freedom of speech, the equal protection of the laws, and constitutionalism.
In this case a fedl court gave the plaintiffs something they didn& #39;t ask for: an order letting voters cast mail ballots after the election& #39;s over & forbidding speech abt the election results for days afterwards. Supreme Court says that& #39;s unconstitutional. If Wisconsin wants to
change its election laws, it can do so at the special session that& #39;ll convene shortly-which the S.Ct. doesn& #39;t interrupt.

Is it fair to characterize this as a big meanie heartless Supreme Court telling people to die in the streets?
Hey! Here& #39;s a GREAT idea! Let& #39;s just let governors change election laws by unilateral "emergency" decree! What could POSSIBLY go wrong with THAT?
Govn& #39;rs execute the law. They have broad emergency pwr. But there& #39;re limits & elections are a darn good place to draw the line.
Wisconsin, BTW, didn& #39;t suspend elections even during the 1918 Spanish Flu, which the Wis bd of health called "the most disastrous calamity that has ever been visited upon the people of Wisconsin." https://www.wisconsinhistory.org/Records/Article/CS2479">https://www.wisconsinhistory.org/Records/A...
You can follow @TimothySandefur.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: