Read on Twitter
Today Microsoft has committed to DANE support for O365, initially outbound by the end of 2020, and later inbound by the end of 2021:
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/exchange-team-blog/support-of-dane-and-dnssec-in-office-365-exchange-online/ba-p/1275494
This is a significant milestone in DANE adoption, three cheers for Microsoft.
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/exchange-team-blog/support-of-dane-and-dnssec-in-office-365-exchange-online/ba-p/1275494
This is a significant milestone in DANE adoption, three cheers for Microsoft.
I posted a comment:
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/exchange-team-blog/support-of-dane-and-dnssec-in-office-365-exchange-online/bc-p/1286587/highlight/true#M28072
Any providers who still think that broken denial of existence does not matter need to get their act together and fix their systems... Ditto for neglected incorrect TLSA RRs.
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/exchange-team-blog/support-of-dane-and-dnssec-in-office-365-exchange-online/bc-p/1286587/highlight/true#M28072
Any providers who still think that broken denial of existence does not matter need to get their act together and fix their systems... Ditto for neglected incorrect TLSA RRs.
I posted a longer note to the Postfix and Exim user lists:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Some-news-on-SMTP-DANE-TLS-td105321.html
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Some-news-on-SMTP-DANE-TLS-td105321.html
To put the timescale for Internet infrastructure changes in perspective, I started work on DANE for SMTP in the spring of 2013: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dukhovni-smtp-opportunistic-tls-00, with RFC7672 published in Oct 2015.
After seven years, do I get Rachel, Leah or both? (And which is which?)
After seven years, do I get Rachel, Leah or both? (And which is which?)
