so people are making a fuss about bh suing a 12 year old. I'm not going to give my opinion about this cause people might come and @ me or send death threats who knows. but really, people are defending them by saying that the child did not know what they were doing. what?...

what kind of defense is that? 12 years old. 12 year olds should not even be on twt. bh did not know they were suing a child, they sued the account. And btw, did you know why they were sued? the kid was accusing a member of sexual assault. sexual assault. how could you randomly..

accuse someone of that? when you were a 12 year old, would you have done that? no right? exactly. And I saw something else, about a minor caught guilty of being a member of the nth room. And another person stated that 12 years old and 17 years old is a big difference.

Is it really? it's 5 years. not that much. most children at that age already know what's wrong and what's right. accusing someone of sexual assault when it didn't even happen? I'm pretty sure that's in the 'wrong' category. I'm just saying. If you want to say that child should..

not be sued, think carefully before you say anything. that's all and thanks for reading this thread :)