There have been a few papers now showing that "fake news" (fabricated/false news) is not as common as people thought. I've answered Q's about this in the past (wrt my research on the topic).

Here's my take: Fake news is just a salient e.g. of a larger category of content

1/7 https://twitter.com/BrendanNyhan/status/1247143760351412225
My research (with @DG_Rand and others) has taken a cognitive science perspective for this very reason. What we learn about the underlying mechanisms that lead people to believe and share fake news is likely to inform us about misinfo, falsehoods, politics, etc more broadly.

2/7
These e.g. (IMO) highlight the utility of the cognitive approach. If you can form an (even broad) understanding of the underlying processes - in addition to the intricacies of the content - the research ought to be applicable to other domains.

That's the goal, anyway!

7/7
You can follow @GordPennycook.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: