It's funny to me how so much stupid violent shit is done in the name of being "inclusive" when tbh I don't give a fuck about your gender nor relationship to patriarchy if the way you think and behave is trustworthy, as far as being around/organizing with you goes.

If you can keep up with what trans women are theorizing and apply it materially e.g. using what you've learned from us to identify transmisogyny rather than explaining away how it isn't transmisogyny, I don't care what kind of non trans woman you are, non-binary, cis man, I don't

If you theorize in a way that centers trans women instead of watering down our theories and stripping them of their substance so that cis people are centered and comfortable in conversations about us then idc if you can't use "me," "I," "we," or "us." I. Really. Do. Not. Care.

Likewise, I'm not impressed if you're able to use "me," "I," "we," and "us" in talking about trans women but in doing so center cis people. If you're cis, really think about which trans women you listen to and whether you've put these women on a pedestal above the rest of us.

Identity matters but liberals develop brain worms in fetishizing identity to the extent that the way they theorize about identity is so absurd that they turn identity into a redundant thing all while pretending that it's e.v.e.r.y.t.h.i.n.g.

Liberals might act like a trans president would be rad, no matter the policy. They def do this w/ cis women. In one breath it's "I want a woman president" and in the next it's a capitulation to right-wing trolling "what should the gender of the president matter?"

This is the absurdity of liberal id politics, which doesn't combine identity w/ materiality but holds it above materiality, worshipping identity as though it's sacred while *simultaneously* disposing of it, lacking the materialist theory to understand where identity emerges from.

Liberals demand a woman representative but no policy that addresses the material conditions of women. The wage gap is met w/ calls for more women CEOs. They're silent about reproductive labor, enjoying conditions in which migrant women & Roombas do a lot of the housework for them

Hence if you scratch a liberal, a fascist bleeds. When it comes to identity this reveal doesn't even require a scratch, just a poke. The liberal's entire concept of identity crumbles, such as "woman" when faced with the demands of colonized women, trans women, etc.

No matter your identity, you can have a mind that works this way, living in a world structured on this self-imploding logic. It's stupid to make "inclusion" strictly about identity. Identity can't be organized around on its own, divorced of an understanding of where it comes from

Organizing around identity alone is what the fascists who liberals claim to hate and be different from do. "Liberal id politics" doesn't just apply to the people we think of as liberals. It's a fascist organizing tool, of whom liberals are merely the more polite & opaque version.

"How do you know (cis person) won't later realize that they're trans when you can't know someone's gender by looking at them?"

Idk, maybe stop being a creep obsessed with "-passing" & "-identifying" who deflects from these misdoings and learn to talk to people like human beings?