A great case study about the proper use of experimental methods. Hint: Navarro needs to go back to school. https://www.axios.com/coronavirus-hydroxychloroquine-white-house-01306286-0bbc-4042-9bfe-890413c6220d.html

Just a reminder that data isn't the plural form of anecdote. Not having a control group requires assuming that the mortality rate without treatment is 100%. Psychological biases make us overemphasize supportive evidence. A "study" that didn't go through peer review isn't a study.

Didn't think the BBC would demonstrate such statistical illiteracy. When stats are made up, you can't draw any conclusions from them. You can't assume that any pattern in made-up stats must reflect a similar pattern in real data. Fake is fake. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-52195034