I really want to know why Filipinos hate people who are too intelligent, too radical, or too fault-finding. Is it rooted in how they were conditioned by their families (often physically abusive and authoritarian) to simply obey just so they can avoid punishment?

Anti-intellectualism might also come from fascist or populist rhetoric, and general distrust of technocratic trapos who betrayed the trust of the masses over the years. They want leaders who are strong, masculine and straightforward, who won't confuse them with misleading jargon.

Our culture which celebrates ignorance and mediocrity makes it a breeding ground for politicans who take pride in the likes of being kicked out of school. We are willing to make leaders even out of poor orators as long as they know what can stir our emotions and passions.

I read a while ago that our anti-intellectualism sprung from our distrust of elitism and individualism, which are hallmarks of Western culture, particularly that of our colonizers. We foster instead a sense of togetherness as Filipinos by encouraging conformity and empathy.

In our country, only 42% finish high school and more than 25% live below the poverty line, so you get the idea of what the typical Filipino is. We are encouraged to associate with it. Those who don't belong in this mould (intellectuals) are not easily trusted, even made fun of.

Politicians and candidates must appeal to the masses, and they can achieve this by downplaying their academic and career achievements. No wonder we elected a demagogue as our President. He may be an elite, but it was overlooked due to his knowledge of manipulating the masses.