@CWA @ReVoLAimaR I think most of the semi-pro/pro community can agree that these qualifying tournaments are filled with RNG and a lot of luck. My suggestion is to either have a completely different format of qualification or have 3-4 max losses in the tournaments. Reasons whyhttps://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="⬇️" title="Downwards arrow" aria-label="Emoji: Downwards arrow">

1. Different format would be amazing. Literally anything else. An example could be like a round robin of 10 players (each match Bo1 to make it not take a million years) and the top 3 advance to the next round robin. Finally, you get down to a couple players and then you get (1/4)

your player that finally qualifies to the actual cup. Of course, I know this could take a long time to do as well. I guess you would have to find some way to limit participation (maybe only 7k+ PB allowed? idk)

2. Max losses. Holy crap this would be so much better. It (2/4)

takes out so much of the RNG and every loss truly has an impact. A lot of ppl in top 8 of each CWA cup qualifier had over 3-4 losses. It truly tests how well you are able to perform under pressure as well. Example: You are on your last loss and have to win out to qualify. (3/4)

Without losses, people can win trade easily, give up in matches instantly f they know they will lose, etc. With losses, this limits or even removes that aspect.

Anyways, I hope you consider this. Thanks for all of the work you guys do for our community. https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="❤️" title="Red heart" aria-label="Emoji: Red heart">https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="❤️" title="Red heart" aria-label="Emoji: Red heart">https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="❤️" title="Red heart" aria-label="Emoji: Red heart">