Read on Twitter
Lemme tell you the difference.
Dillin shit talks people.
You struck him with unfair copyright strikes.
Your career with Sonic Paradox is fine, and your income is fine.
Dillin's has two strikes, and his income is at risk because YouTube is his main source of income. https://twitter.com/CaptainAWF/status/1246474336183214083
Dillin shit talks people.
You struck him with unfair copyright strikes.
Your career with Sonic Paradox is fine, and your income is fine.
Dillin's has two strikes, and his income is at risk because YouTube is his main source of income. https://twitter.com/CaptainAWF/status/1246474336183214083
Dillin's YouTube and his Pateron is the only source of income and even with that, he's barely scraping by. So to have you come along and put his livelihood at risk is not the same as "Being mean back to him".
For comparison's sake, Dillin flicked you in the head. It was annoying, your day would be better without it, but asides from that, ignoring it or flicking back would be fine.
However, you turned around and smashed his knee. Saying "I'm just being mean back" is very unfair.
However, you turned around and smashed his knee. Saying "I'm just being mean back" is very unfair.
The punishment does not fit the crime. What you should have done was to just ignore him. I know that having shit be talked about you online puts you in defense mode, trust me, I've been there, but engaging in this was your worst mistake.
Dillin is a troll. He talks shit to get a rise out of people. The way to deal with trolls is not to get them erased from the internet, but to just ignore them. That's how the internet works. You don't go around using YouTube's broken rules to silence mockery of your work,
Especially when
1) The IP is not yours.
And
2) When the videos in question fall under fair use.
Using false copyright strikes to silence negative feedback of your work never makes you look good. We've seen this with Derek Savage, Gamerguyd and now you.
1) The IP is not yours.
And
2) When the videos in question fall under fair use.
Using false copyright strikes to silence negative feedback of your work never makes you look good. We've seen this with Derek Savage, Gamerguyd and now you.
On top of this, your copyright strikes were already set up before you even made your demands to Dillin, so do not lie to me and say that "He had every opportunity to avoid this" because he didn't.
You can say that Dillin had you blocked, but let me ask; Does that make your pre-made copyright strikes any better? Does rigging the deal to fit your ends, when you knew that you couldn't warn him beforehand, make you look like the good guy here?
Before you go and say I'm attacking you, don't bother. I haven't insulted you once and I'm just pointing out where you went wrong and how you could've handled the situation better. Though with that said, I would offer that you remove the strikes.
You didn't like the mockery, I get that, but this situation is very easy to fix. If you remove the strikes and move on, you will never have to deal with Dillin again. Dillin has said himself that he doesn't want to talk to you, he just wants the strikes gone.
Doesn't that sound like the easiest way out of this? You don't have to talk, you just remove the strikes and the feud is over. Moving on without conflict?
Do you see a problem with that? Because I don't.
Do you see a problem with that? Because I don't.
Please make the right decision AWF. I don't want to remember you as the guy that abused copyright because he didn't like what was said about him. I want to remember you as the person who redeems himself and drops this like he should've done in the first place.
This whole mess you made is only going to cause you a bigger headache. People will hear about this. People will speak up, and there's gonna be nothing you can do to stop them.
Please AWF. It isn't too late to change everything.
