Read on Twitter
Alan Kurdi& #39;s death was relentlessly used to shame white people who wanted to preserve their nation and safeguard it from invasion.
The murder of #EmilyJones, a direct result of that invasion, has been attributed to a "random attack" with the Somali murderer& #39;s identity concealed.
The murder of #EmilyJones, a direct result of that invasion, has been attributed to a "random attack" with the Somali murderer& #39;s identity concealed.
And while the media insisted we all see Kurdi& #39;s lifeless body so we& #39;ll feel guilty by proxy for his death, now that we know his death was caused Turkish human traffickers, that part of the story won& #39;t receive anything more than a passing mention. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/13/world/middleeast/alan-kurdi-death-trial.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/1...
In a few years, most people will remember the drowned boy being a result of having a border and will know nothing of his real cause of death.
#EmilyJones won& #39;t be remembered by most of those same people, and most of those who do remember her won& #39;t know who killed her.
#EmilyJones won& #39;t be remembered by most of those same people, and most of those who do remember her won& #39;t know who killed her.
This begs the question: Why is the media so heavily invested in pushing a particular narrative, one that leads to Somalis and other invaders murdering our children, like #EmilyJones?
Why is it that the same people aiding (if not directly responsible for) the invasion are also committed to shaming those who oppose it and its consequences?
