Thread

Anon-Twitter is mostly a hypothetical platform and I really dont understand some of d ego-battles(or whterver intra-philosophy battle in Far-RW section.)hr.From what I see n understand,most of the factions/pills agree on roughly 60/100 basic things and hv usually issues+

wid remaining 40,which can be related to history,Shastras,future of civilisation,dealing wid Ms, wid gharwapsi etc etc.I personally think these stuff can b discussed in DM and sorted out.Sometimes,ppl tend to disagree wid only 1 tweet of a person & block,forgetting all previous+

agreemnts/friendshp etc. My pt is Far-RW needs a limited "agree to disagree"(doesnt imply dt u can compromise wid basics) among themselves inorder to stay united.I understand that Raytas or the Liberal/Centre RW cant be accomodated given some of their extreme naive opinions.+

I dont take part in some of the scriptural or civilisation discussions as I havent read much or can give strng points.(& mostly stick to history,where there are agreements & disagreements,sometimes irritating ones).I understand dt folks can disagree/troll/complimnt me,but my pt +

is u stick u to the theme of debate/dicussion unless its some sort of personal abuse from opponent side.

So,my point is one is one can always choose 2 ignore,rather than starting a slugfest of abusing personally/ethnically/casteist way or creating teams to abuse the opponent+

pill/faction.

n/n