For the first time, I've been brought in as a new reviewer on a manuscript that received an R&R. Previously, the paper received (and responded to) 3 very thorough reviews.
Do you do anything different when you've been in this position? If so, what do you do? If not, why not?
Do you do anything different when you've been in this position? If so, what do you do? If not, why not?
Thanks, everyone! Very helpful.
I decided to use the Blais Heuristic (from @ablais_udem). https://twitter.com/ablais_udem/status/1245827247552040962
I decided to use the Blais Heuristic (from @ablais_udem). https://twitter.com/ablais_udem/status/1245827247552040962