This is a good piece. But I find myself increasingly hostile to the economist& #39;s way of thinking in this context precisely because it refuses to admit trade-offs between incommensurable values. https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-04-02/coronavirus-why-epidemiologists-and-economists-keep-arguing">https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/a...
I think the way statistical value of life estimates get deployed to estimate the economic value of limiting mass death is intellectually, morally, and politically bogus -- even when I agree with the upshot.
The inherently political nature of human life is what it is precisely because we don& #39;t agree about what& #39;s valuable, about what& #39;s sacred, about what can be permissibly traded off against what.
Emergencies like this demand muscular technocratic management, but technocratic management is basically impossible unless you& #39;re relentlessly focused on maximizing a single variable.
But that means you& #39;re screwing over some people& #39;s fundamental values outside the normal political channels for regulating intractable disagreement and negotiating compromise. This is a cost, too.