Wide booty =\\= fat booty. Geometry teaches us the measurements of 3 dimensional solid matter are length, width, and height; whereas L= back to booty cuff, W= Distance btw L cheek/R cheek, and H is represented by depth to which the ass pokes off of pelvis, in this thread I wil...

...I will not only refute the notion that one may have a “fat” ass with length and width alone, but I will assert the validity of a new unit of gluteal measurement, ‘cupability’ (the extent to which circumference of the cheeks allows for sufficient palm gripping) as having sta...

...statistically significant correlation w the third and most crucial dimension of H, in which the ‘fatness’ of a booty lies. To support my theory the subject need only turn to the side where the height to which the booty extends off the pelvis can be observed. Subjects posses...

...possessing above average booty lengths/widths often do not have sufficient cupability, whereas subjects w shorter lengths/widths may offer exponentially more cupability and therefore H, thus validating the theory width =\\= ‘fat’ness but fatness is correlated w cupability. Th..

...this is not to refute the importance of gluteal tissue lacking cupability, L, W, or H. Tip Drill (Nelly, 2003) establishes via a population sample of 100 cheeks, variables such as firmness, softness, clap to comeback ratio, & dothatbitchwiggletivity establish hierarchy...

In conclusion, while all gluteal tissue matters, s lacking in the dimension of height (cupability) are NOT in fact fat, but are great in it’s own way pending other variables. The experimentation, statistical analyses, and implications of my data are reproducible (w/ consent)