Let me count the ways that this is a stupid & hypocritical argument.
1. Does the modern Labour Party have a working class membership, or is it increasingly a gentrified collection of hooray far lefties, v. comfortably off older public sector workers and students? Hmm...
https://twitter.com/FisherAndrew79/status/1245348506258243591
1. Does the modern Labour Party have a working class membership, or is it increasingly a gentrified collection of hooray far lefties, v. comfortably off older public sector workers and students? Hmm...

2. If 'current level of mass working class support' is your measure of political validity Andrew, then I look forward to you joining the Conservative Party soon.
In membership and electoral support, Corbyn's Labour were/are a middle-class party
In membership and electoral support, Corbyn's Labour were/are a middle-class party
3. It's true that BL is a v small strand within the current Labour Party - but that's a reflection of the modern Labour Party, which has cut itself off into a bizarre little bubble of insane social radicalism and identity politics (which is why the working class mostly vote Tory)
4. BL's approach - economically left, patriotic, socially moderately conservative - is, according to every survey, where a massive % of the British public is. If Labour took any notice of BL, every indication is that such an approach could be v popular, esp. w/ the working class
5. The 'Maurice Glasman is a Cambridge-educated peer' argument is shitty ad hominem stuff. He came from a working class Jewish background and got into Cambridge (so what?), Ed Miliband made him a peer because of his community organising work, campaigning for the Living Wage.