Read on Twitter
i would almost argue that none of the homestuck kids are related “biologically”
theyre related familially essentially because they perceive, individually, that theyre related familially (whether that perception is built off of notions of their own view of “biological relation” or simply a recognization of the social & cultural constructs of relation)
i think even using the term “related” or “relation” for like, biological descriptions of sex & birth & whatever, is like, super loaded.
and my point isnt to like, determine if ectobiology clones count as being fathers and mothers, “biologically”, my point is that question is totally disinteresting
i know this directly contradicts the explicit text of the first tweet of this thread but that was more of a hook to hyperbolically illustrate my point im not actually interested in arguing abt the irl implications of ectobiology cuz thats the exact angels-on-a-pinhead pointless
theorizing i find tiresome
