The speech or debate clause of the constitution, which conveys privileges on lawmakers, could be used by Burr as a shield against providing some info to investigators:

https://www.npr.org/2020/03/31/824958381/justice-department-looking-into-senators-stock-selloff
'Why the focus on Burr?' a colleague asked.

Any many others ask: what about Senator So-and-So?

I wrote a list of why investigators might be most inclined to probe Burr's stock transactions specifically and why the public facts are more suspicious:
Burr's stock trades were made on a single day, they were an unusually high volume of transactions based on his previous trading activity, were focused on the hospitality sector, and his personal acknowledgement that he was behind the sales.
You can follow @timkmak.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: