Here& #39;s a quick overview of the case for synthetic & #39;ElectroFuels& #39; for aviation by @ChrisGoodall2 in the @Independent.

It& #39;s crucial to note that this is entirely different from what the industry means when it talks excitedly about & #39;Sustainable Aviation Fuels& #39;, or SAFs.

1/n
SAFs are highly problematic, because just like other #Biofuels, they rely on a ready supply of Bio-based materials to use as & #39;feedstock& #39; & each type brings with it a variety of #energy, environmental & #biodiversity complications.

2/n
For instance, SAF feedstocks include material with high Cellulose & Lignin content, such as wood or straw.
In addition, animal fats, vegetable oils, or sugars can be used.

3/n
These feedstocks can be by-products of timber or #food production, which sounds great, however they& #39;re not just lying around waiting for #aviation to buy up, convert to fuel & burn; endless industries, processes & businesses already make use of them.

4/n
Side note:
The conversion of these feedstocks into aviation fuel, is not without its own carbon emissions & the Government& #39;s advisor, @theCCCuk, recommends that all #biofuel production should be equipped with carbon capture & storage ( #CCS).

5/n
The gigantic scale of SAF production needed to make a dent in aviation& #39;s #Carbon emissions, would therefore displace existing uses for all sorts of feedstocks & require them to source something else instead - that doesn& #39;t cut #emissions, it just shifts them elsewhere.

6/n
This leads to another, well-known issue with large-scale Biofuel production: competition with the food system.

It& #39;s both simpler & cheaper not to bother with by-products & instead grow crops specifically for conversion to Biofuels.

We& #39;re familiar with one already: #PalmOil

7/n
Sadly, agriculture already has a huge impact on the #environment, climate & #biodiversity, so adding the burden of growing crops for aviation fuel to the mix, has some obvious & very serious undesirable consequences, not to mention huge Greenhouse Gas #emissions.

8/n
One more proposal for making sustainable aviation fuels, is using household #waste as feedstock.

This consists of:
1. Extracting the organic, or #food waste for processing, similarly to other biomass.

2. More ambitious plans, to convert unrecyclable #plastic waste.

But...

9/n
...if turning the ubiquitous problem of #plastic waste, into liquid fuel for aeroplanes sounds a little too good to be true, I& #39;m afraid it is and it& #39;s not hard to see why....

10/n
Plastic waste is a huge issue, for all sorts of reasons, but it does represent a store of fossil hydrocarbons in a solid, stable form.

Converting #plastic into transport fuel however, means that whenever it& #39;s used, that stored carbon is released into the atmosphere.

11/n
So, in #carbon terms, jet fuel made from plastic is similar to burning the oil/gas it took to make the plastic in the first place (plus the emissions from multiple production steps).

In exchange, we get a few minutes use, of an often superfluous material.

Sustainable? No.

12/n
Thoughts on the article:

As pointed out, sourcing sufficient #Co2 is challenging.

Drax power station in Yorkshire has been burning imported wood pellets in four of its six furnaces (converted from #coal) for years & is committed to figuring out how to capture its Co2.

14/n
As & when it& #39;s capturing carbon, Drax will be representative of a & #39;negative emissions& #39; technology, the like of which IPCC climate stabilisation pathways are heavily dependent on: Bio Energy with Carbon Capture & Storage ( #BECCS).

15/n
BECCS understandably has its critics & I& #39;m far from enthusiastic about relying on such a contentious technology to reach our climate goals, however it looks like we& #39;re stuck with it, so worth considering as a source of Co2 for electrofuels, at least in the medium term.

16/n
Another medium-term technology we& #39;re stuck with, is the fleet of combined cycle gas turbines, currently producing ~ 38% of the UK& #39;s electricity.

Gas combustion produces >40% less Co2 than coal for equivalent energy, but nevertheless, we should be capturing the Co2 emitted.

17/n
On the #Hydrogen side, the challenge is clear, although no less significant: securing massive amounts of renewable electricity.

My view, is that alongside legislating for escalating electro fuel content, the Government must require production to be vertically integrated.

18/n
That is to say, the energy majors & other aviation fuel partners, should not be allowed to cannibalise the electricity grid, to power Hydrogen via electrolysis.

This will spur competition, investment & innovation within the industry, of efficient Hydrogen production.

19/n
The advantage of this approach is threefold:
1. It separates aviation e-fuel production from the wider global energy market, removing exposure to price, supply & exchange rate volatility.

2. It removes the perverse influence of aviation demand for Bio feedstock.

20/n
3. Finally, it creates a reliable global market & supply chain for green #Hydrogen, which is generally expected to be needed well beyond 2050 in liquid form, to power long-haul flights, either via combustion, or fuel cells to power electric motors.

21/n
Of course, Hydrogen has long been a vital part of the world economy, but most of its production is dependent on natural gas & very #carbon intensive.

By harnessing the aviation sector to drive innovation & scale in green #Hydrogen, the benefits will cascade across sectors.

22/n
You can follow @CirclingBear.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: