Read on Twitter
I want to highlight some non-mainstream work on reproducibility, open science, replication crisis, meta-science by women. Reading and drawing from a diverse set of authors and ideas will help push this stream of work forward and help make science more open and inclusive.
I will only be able to highlight a few select work by these awesome scholars but follow them, look up their work, and cite them. And please do add what I have missed to my thread. I& #39;ll keep adding more as well.
1. @o_guest has written on open science and computational reproducibility. See for example https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/1230144174751698946?s=20">https://twitter.com/o_guest/s... and this one with @andrea_e_martin https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389041713000314">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a...
2. @IrisVanRooij has written on preregistration and the theory crisis. See https://featuredcontent.psychonomic.org/psychological-science-needs-theory-development-before-preregistration/">https://featuredcontent.psychonomic.org/psycholog... and https://twitter.com/IrisVanRooij/status/1233509131111325696?s=20">https://twitter.com/IrisVanRo...
3. See also this paper on preregistration with @IrisVanRooij @djnavarro and @TrishaVZ among the authors https://psyarxiv.com/x36pz/ ">https://psyarxiv.com/x36pz/&qu...
4. @djnavarro has written on the interplay between science and statistics https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42113-018-0019-z">https://link.springer.com/article/1... and on preregistration https://djnavarro.net/post/paths-in-strange-spaces/">https://djnavarro.net/post/path...
5. @chbergma has written on reproducibility https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/infa.12182">https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/... and preregistration https://psyarxiv.com/es2gx ,">https://psyarxiv.com/es2gx&quo... the latter together with @NaomiHavron
6. @kirstie_j does great work on open science tools, resources, and workflow. See https://search.proquest.com/openview/f4042b3119a79ae8a561ba641bbed7f8/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2045579">https://search.proquest.com/openview/... and https://twitter.com/kirstie_j/status/1118401811910746112?s=20">https://twitter.com/kirstie_j...
7. @cailinmeister does work on social structures in science, epistemic diversity, and false beliefs. See http://cailinoconnor.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Misinformation_Groupthink.pdf">https://cailinoconnor.com/wp-conten... and https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/697744">https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/1...
8. @SabinaLeonelli has written on reproducibility as a criterion for research quality #loginreload">https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S0743-41542018000036B009/full/html #loginreload">https://www.emerald.com/insight/c...
9. I am working on advancing a theoretical understanding of reproducibility and scientific process. See https://twitter.com/zerdeve/status/1128734143347445760?s=20">https://twitter.com/zerdeve/s... and https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.04525 ">https://arxiv.org/abs/1811....
10. See also this paper on robust modeling together with @_a_c__, @dora_matzke, Jennifer Trueblood, myself, and others https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42113-019-00029-y">https://link.springer.com/article/1...
11. https://twitter.com/chbergma/status/1234910959178854401?s=20">https://twitter.com/chbergma/...
12. (See also the tweet above this) https://twitter.com/rolandlangrock/status/1234922858062721024?s=21">https://twitter.com/rolandlan... https://twitter.com/RolandLangrock/status/1234922858062721024">https://twitter.com/RolandLan...
13. @Nicole_C_Nelson does work on STS. See examples: https://estsjournal.org/index.php/ests/article/view/345">https://estsjournal.org/index.php... and http://nicolenelson.net/research/ ">https://nicolenelson.net/research/...
14. @cantabile has written on mathematical reproducibility https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-15-1960-4_8">https://link.springer.com/chapter/1... and scientific workflow https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.06964 .">https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.... Watch for more cool papers to come out of her dissertation work!
15. @victoriastodden has a lot of work on computational reproducibility. See https://www.pnas.org/content/115/11/2584.short">https://www.pnas.org/content/1... and https://www.crcpress.com/Implementing-Reproducible-Research/Stodden-Leisch-Peng/p/book/9781466561595">https://www.crcpress.com/Implement... and look up the rest.
16. @LorenaABarba has written on reproducible computer science: See https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8661798">https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/... and https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8842605">https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/...
17. Shirley Wang https://twitter.com/cailinmeister/status/1234972615552331779?s=20">https://twitter.com/cailinmei...
18. Don’t miss this article on open access publishing model by @CNSteltenpohl @AmyJAnd and Katherine Daniels https://www.gjcpp.org/en/article.php?issue=33&article=199">https://www.gjcpp.org/en/articl...
Wanted to make this thread bec of the apparent gender bias in the citation practices in the metascience/reproducibility lit. Many folks are not aware of the work done by women in the field. If you’re curious about your own citation patterns, here’s a tool: https://twitter.com/max_bertolero/status/1234965161062039560?s=21">https://twitter.com/max_berto...
19. See also @FeestUljana’s work on replications http://journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.108 …">https://journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/1...
20. https://twitter.com/chbergma/status/1236580994347663360?s=21">https://twitter.com/chbergma/...
21. I think I gotta add this here as well although @djnavarro and I appeared on the list before. New stuff from us. https://twitter.com/zerdeve/status/1255168642938880001?s=21">https://twitter.com/zerdeve/s... https://twitter.com/zerdeve/status/1255168642938880001">https://twitter.com/zerdeve/s...
